How does palliative care fit into national health spending? A secondary analysis of trends in long-term healthcare expenditure in the United Kingdom
De-Alker, E.; Alcock, A.; Murtagh, F. E.
Show abstract
ObjectivesCurrent methods of health expenditure reporting make spending on palliative care services difficult to quantify. This paper (1) examines trends in the components of government (public) spending on health-related long-term care reported in the UK Health Accounts for the period of 2013 to 2022 to establish the wider context of palliative care expenditure, and (2) relates these trends to existing knowledge of expenditure on specialist palliative care services in the UK. MethodsWe conducted a descriptive secondary analysis of annually reported government expenditure on health-related long-term care between 2013 and 2022 from the UK Health Accounts dataset. We contrasted this with UK governmental and non-governmental spending on specialist palliative care services using annual expenditure figures reported by Hospice UK. ResultsReal-terms UK government spending on health-related long-term care grew by {pound}6.4 billion (22.9%) between 2013 and 2022, from {pound}27.9 to {pound}34.3 billion. Real-terms spending on specialist palliative care grew by {pound}110 million (10.7%) over the same period, from {pound}1,027 to {pound}1,137 million. In 2022, spending on inpatient care comprised the majority of government health-related long-term care expenditure ({pound}22.6 billion; 65.9%). Home-based care comprised one-third ({pound}11.8 billion; 33.4%). Outpatient care accounted for 0.7% ({pound}260.2 million). Equivalent data was not available for analysis of specialist palliative care expenditure. ConclusionsLow granularity of UK national health expenditure accounts limits national and international comparisons of spending on palliative care. However, it is clear that UK expenditure on specialist palliative care services has not kept pace with growth in expenditure on health-related long-term care. What is already known on this topicO_LIGlobal demand for palliative care is increasing as rates of serious life-limiting illness, dementia, cancer and multiple long-term conditions rise internationally. C_LIO_LIIncreasing complexity of illness and population ageing are two factors implicated in both rising healthcare expenditure and growing demand for palliative care internationally. C_LIO_LIThe UK has previously been ranked as providing the highest quality of palliative care amongst international competitors - however, concerns about the longevity of funding sources for specialist palliative care services has led to calls for further investment. C_LI What this study addsO_LIReal terms UK government spending on health-related long-term care - which includes, but is not limited to, palliative care services - increased by 22.9% between 2013 and 2022. C_LIO_LIOver the same period, UK spending on specialist palliative care services as reported by Hospice UK grew by only 10.7%. C_LIO_LIOur results take into account health-related social care spending, which forms a key part of care for people living with illness, including those receiving palliative care services. C_LI How this study might affect research, practice or policyO_LIThe future of funding for specialist palliative care in the UK is uncertain, and current funding frameworks are complex. This paper adds to ongoing policy discussions surrounding this issue, highlighting the discrepancy between growth in public sector spending on health-related long-term care and overall spending on specialist palliative care services (from governmental and non-governmental sources). C_LI
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Understanding and addressing challenges for Advance Care Planning in the COVID-19 pandemic: An analysis of the UK CovPall survey data from specialist palliative care services 93%
- ‘Necessity is the mother of invention’: Specialist palliative care service innovation and practice change in response to COVID-19. Results from a multi-national survey (CovPall) 93%
- Defining and measuring unmet palliative care needs among people with life-limiting illness: a scoping review of international evidence 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Public acceptability of non-pharmaceutical interventions to control a pandemic in the United Kingdom: a discrete choice experiment 93%
- Ethnic variation in outcome of people hospitalised with Covid-19 in Wales (UK): A rapid analysis of surveillance data using Onomap, a name-based ethnicity classification tool 92%
- Inequality in access to health and care services during lockdown - Findings from the COVID-19 survey in five UK national longitudinal studies 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Community end-of-life care during the COVID-19 pandemic: Initial findings of a UK primary care survey 92%
- A mixed-methods evaluation of patients’ views on primary care multi-disciplinary teams in Scotland 91%
- Patient characteristics associated with clinically coded long COVID: an OpenSAFELY study using electronic health records 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- An observational study of survival outcomes of people referred for ‘fast-track’ end-of-life care funding in a District General Hospital; too little too late? 94%
- National statutory reporting: not even ticking the boxes? The quality of ‘Learning from Deaths’ reporting in Quality Accounts within the NHS in England 2017-2020 92%
- Improving local authority financial support services for users with complex health needs: a mixed-method economic evaluation of Social Navigators in South Tyneside, UK 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- STIMULATE-ICP-CAREINEQUAL - Defining usual care and examining inequalities in Long Covid support: protocol for a mixed-methods study (part of STIMULATE-ICP: Symptoms, Trajectory, Inequalities and Management: Understanding Long-COVID to Address and Transform Existing Integrated Care Pathways) 92%
- Beyond social prescribing - the use of social return on investment (SROI) analysis in integrated health and social care interventions in England and Wales: a protocol for a systematic review 92%
- STIMULATE-ICP-Delphi (Symptoms, Trajectory, Inequalities and Management: Understanding Long-COVID to Address and Transform Existing Integrated Care Pathways Delphi): Study Protocol 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.