Back

Genomic and pedigree-based approaches to predict parental breeding values for nut and kernel traits in almond (Prunus dulcis Mill. D. A. Webb)

Goonetilleke, S.; Wilkinson, M. J.; Wirthensohn, M. G.; Collins, C.; Furtado, A.; Henry, R. J.; Hardner, C.

2026-01-24 genetics
10.64898/2026.01.22.701136 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The self-incompatibility, perennial growth habit, large tree size, and long juvenility present challenges in applying traditional breeding approaches in almond (Prunus dulcis Mill. D. A. Webb). Moreover, nut and kernel traits in almond are mainly controlled by a large number of small-effect quantitative trait loci (QTLs) and improving complex traits through conventional breeding approaches is slow and often inefficient. Genome-wide selection represents a promising strategy to enhance the efficiency of cultivar identification and selection of superior parents in almond breeding programs by estimating the breeding values (BVs) at early maturity. The main aim of this study was to implement genomic (GBLUP) and pedigree-based (ABLUP) prediction approaches to estimate BVs to identify the superior parental candidates for improving nut and kernel traits in almond. Here, we estimated BVs for nine traits that are commonly used in the primary evaluation stage of the almond breeding using genomic data from 61 parents and phenotypic data of 15,281 progeny derived from 205 unique families. Breeding values obtained from both approaches showed a strong correlation (r [≥] 0.94) for all traits except shell seal (r = 0.87). The population structure analysis conducted using high-quality 90K single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) indicated clear separation of the Californian, European and some old Australian almond cultivars, with considerable admixture across some cultivars. Following further validation, both prediction approaches could be useful in early identification of superior candidates. The slightly higher breeding values obtained using the GBLUP compared to the ABLUP approach suggest that accounting for within-family variations and realised genomic relationships can enhance prediction accuracy, reliability, and overall genomic prediction performance in almond.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 7%
22.7%
2
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
10.2%
3
The Plant Genome
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.4%
5
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.4%
7
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
8
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
9
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
10
Crop Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
11
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
12
Plant Methods
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
13
G3
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
14
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
15
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
16
Aquaculture
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
17
Pest Management Science
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
18
Plant Phenomics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
19
Plant Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
20
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
21
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.8%
22
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
24
Phytopathology®
28 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%