Back

Feature Integration of FDG PET Brain Imaging Using Deep Learning for Sensitive Cognitive Decline Detection

Lee, Y.; Kim, S.; Kim, S.; Kang, Y.; Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative,

2026-01-28 neurology
10.64898/2026.01.22.26344669 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundDistinguishing individuals with cognitive decline (CD), including early Alzheimers disease, from cognitively normal (CN) individuals is essential for improving diagnostic accuracy and enabling timely intervention. Positron emission tomography (PET) captures functional brain alterations associated with CD, but its broader application is often limited by cost and radiation exposure. To enhance the clinical utility of PET while addressing data limitations, we propose a multi-representational learning framework that leverages both imaging data and region-level quantification in a data-efficient manner. MethodsVoxel-level features were extracted using convolutional neural networks (CNN) or principal component analysis networks (PCANet) from [{superscript 1}F]FDG PET imaging. Region-level features were derived from standardized uptake value ratio measurements across predefined brain regions and processed using a deep neural network (DNN). These voxel- and region-level information are integrated through direct concatenation. For final prediction, different machine learning models and ensemble technique were applied. The models were trained and validated using 5-fold cross-validation on PET scans from 252 participants in the Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), comprising 118 CN and 134 CD subjects. Additional correlation analysis and disease classification comparison with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) were also performed. ResultsIn 5-fold cross-validation, CNN, PCANet, and DNN models achieved classification accuracies of 0.69 {+/-} 0.04, 0.69 {+/-} 0.06, and 0.82 {+/-} 0.06, respectively. The integrated DNN-CNN model using direct concatenation yielded the highest accuracy (0.87 {+/-} 0.05), with a 6.10% improvement in accuracy and reduced standard deviation relative to the DNN-only model. Moreover, there were an increase of 14.29% in Recall (0.77 to 0.88) and an increase of 7.32% in F1-Score (0.82 to 0.88). Moreover, the model output showed a significant level of relation with MMSE, and it outperformed the MMSE-based classification in accuracy, recall, and f1, except precision. ConclusionCombining PET imaging with region-level quantification and deep learning improves diagnostic performance over single-feature based models. Notably, fusion-based approaches enhanced sensitivity to cognitive decline. This multimodal strategy offers a more data-efficient and accurate approach for classifying cognitive decline and supports broader PET application in clinical settings.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
42.2%
2
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
38 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.6%
3
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.8%
50% of probability mass above
4
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
52 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.3%
5
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.9%
6
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
7
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.5%
8
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
9
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.2%
10
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
11
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
12
Neurobiology of Aging
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.8%
14
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
15
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
16
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
17
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
18
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.8%
19
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Neuroimaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
23
Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
24
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
25
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
The Innovation
12 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
27
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
28
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%