Mental health symptom changes by sex or gender during COVID-19 compared to pre-pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis update
Sung, G. C. Y.; Wu, Y.; Fan, S.; Dal Santo, T.; Gonzalez-Dominguez, N. P.; Sun, Y.; Li, L.; Li, K.; Jiang, X.; Tasleem, A.; Wang, Y.; Boruff, J. T.; Desai, P.; Tougas, B.; D'Onofrio, M.; Krishnan, A.; Adams, C.; He, C.; Henry, R. S.; Alkan, A.; Rice, D. B.; Markham, S.; Azar, M.; Nassar, E.-L.; Hu, S.; Canedo-Ayala, M.; Neupane, D.; Benedetti, A.; Thombs, B. D.
Show abstract
KEY POINTSO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSDid changes in mental health symptoms from pre-COVID-19 to during the pandemic differ by sex or gender? FindingsIn this systematic review and meta-analysis study of findings from 27 unique cohorts, changes from before to during the COVID-19 pandemic in mental health symptoms, including general mental health, anxiety, depression, and stress, were not statistically significantly different by sex or gender. MeaningThere were not likely substantial sex and gender differences in mental health symptom changes during the COVID-19 pandemic. ImportanceConcerns remain about whether COVID-19 affected mental health differently across sex or gender groups. We previously reported that changes in general mental health and anxiety symptoms, but not depression or stress, worsened more for females or women than males or men, but that was based on 12 studies published up to August 2021. ObjectiveTo investigate the sex or gender differences in mental health symptoms before and during the COVID-19 pandemic with updated evidence. Data SourcesMEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, medRxiv, Open Science Framework Preprints searched to August 31, 2023. Study SelectionEligible studies included change data for general mental health, anxiety symptoms, depression symptoms, or stress from pre-to during COVID-19 by sex or gender. Two independent reviewers reviewed citations for eligibility. Data Extraction and SynthesisStandardized mean differences (SMDs) were extracted for changes of continuous outcomes and proportions for dichotomous outcomes. Two independent reviewers completed data extraction and risk of bias assessment with an adapted Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist for Prevalence Studies. Data were pooled by random-effects models. Main Outcomes and MeasuresDifference in change of SMDs and proportions between sex or gender groups pre-COVID-19 to COVID-19. ResultsWe included data from 27 unique cohorts (N = 102 to 18,127). Change differences by sex or gender were minimal and not statistically significant: general mental health (SMD changewomen-men = 0.01, 95% confidence interval [CI]:-0.07 to 0.10; proportion changewomen-men = -0.03, 95% CI: -0.08 to 0.03), anxiety (SMD changewomen-men = 0.09, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.22; proportion changewomen-men = -0.05, 95% CI: -0.20 to 0.11), depression (SMD changewomen-men = 0.10, 95% CI: -0.00 to 0.20; proportion changewomen-men = -0.13, 95% CI: -0.81 to 0.55), and stress (SMD changewomen-men = -0.08, 95% CI -0.16 to 0.01, proportion changewomen-men = 0.04, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.17). No studies reported eligible mental health outcomes for gender minorities. Conclusion and RelevanceWe found no significant sex or gender differences in mental health changes. Future research should report outcomes for gender minority groups, even if small numbers, to support evidence synthesis. RegistrationPROSPERO (CRD42020179703)
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on anxiety and depression symptoms of young people in the Global South: evidence from a four-country cohort study 95%
- Mechanisms linking physical activity with psychiatric symptoms: a protocol for a systematic review 94%
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on diagnoses of common mental health disorders in adults in Catalonia, Spain 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies comparing mental health before versus during the COVID-19 pandemic 97%
- Life-years lost associated with mental illness: a cohort study of beneficiaries of a South African medical insurance scheme 94%
- Conspiratorial thinking in a 50-state survey of American adults 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Single-session intervention with and without video support to prevent the worsening of emotional distress among healthcare workers during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a randomized clinical trial 94%
- Living alone and mental health: parallel analyses in longitudinal population surveys and electronic health records prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
- A tool to assess risk of bias in studies estimating the prevalence of mental health disorders (RoB-PrevMH) 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mental health problems in the general population during and after the first lockdown phase due to the SARS-Cov-2 pandemic: Rapid review of multi-wave studies 95%
- Uncovering Survivorship Bias in Longitudinal Mental Health Surveys 95%
- Lifetime incidence and age of onset of mental disorders, and 12-month service utilization in primary and secondary care: a Finnish nationwide registry study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Psychosocial family-level mediators in the intergenerational transmission of trauma: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis 95%
- Gender-affirming care, mental health, and economic stability in the time of COVID-19: a global cross-sectional study of transgender and non-binary people 94%
- Individual Participant Data Network Meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for survivors of intimate partner violence: Study protocol 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.