Back

Advanced 3D spheroid-based skin models and deep-learning based image analysis enable in-depth investigation of keratinocyte differentiation and barrier function

Cesetti, T.; Buerger, C.; Couturier, N.; Nuernberg, E.; Bruch, R.; Lang, V.; Hafner, M.; Reischl, M.; Fauth, T.; Rudolf, R.

2026-01-23 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.01.21.700040 bioRxiv
Show abstract

To date, a panel of different biological models have been used in skin research, ranging from in vivo testing to 2D and 3D cultures. Among these, organotypic skin models represent the current gold standard for preclinical dermatology and toxicology studies. However, they are variable in quality and require long maturation times and a lot of work and cells, the latter often of primary origin. Here, we propose dermal-epidermal spheroids as an alternative model that balances physiological relevance and throughput. Next to corresponding full thickness skin models, different fibroblast/keratinocyte coculture spheroids were generated. These used the commonly employed HaCaT cells as well as two recently immortalized keratinocyte cell lines, NHK-SV/TERT and NHK-E6/E7. To investigate their differentiation with detailed spatio-temporal resolution, a deep-learning segmentation-based pipeline, capable of revealing nuclear morphology and positioning as well as marker expression with single-cell precision, was developed and applied. Moreover, the formation of a functional barrier was assessed by live-imaging of Lucifer yellow diffusion. These experiments identified the NHK-E6/E7 cell line as the most and HaCaT cells as the least suitable alternative to primary keratinocytes in both spheroids and full thickness models. Furthermore, NHK-based coculture spheroids displayed functional maturation, including stratification, cornification, and barrier formation, closely recapitulating these features of corresponding full thickness models. Given the scalability and compatibility with automation, these micro-skin fibroblast/NHK-based 3D coculture spheroids might represent a promising new platform for pharmaceutical, cosmetic, and toxicological testing.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
14.5%
2
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.4%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.9%
4
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
5
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
6
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.6%
8
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.9%
10
ACS Sensors
45 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
11
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
12
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
13
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
14
ACS Applied Bio Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
16
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.7%
17
Advanced Materials
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
18
Materials Today Bio
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
19
Bioactive Materials
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
20
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
21
Journal of Controlled Release
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
22
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
23
Advanced Materials Technologies
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
24
Advanced Therapeutics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
25
Chemical Engineering Journal
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
26
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
27
The Analyst
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
28
Biomaterials Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
29
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
30
Analytica Chimica Acta
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%