Co-developing a Survey on Public Understanding of Sustainable Clinical Research: A Study Protocol
Keegan, D.; ONeill, L.; Doran, P.
Show abstract
BackgroundClinical research is essential for medical advancement but contributes to carbon emissions through activities such as travel, data management, and laboratory processes. As healthcare systems move towards net-zero targets, there is a growing need to understand public awareness of and attitudes towards environmental sustainability in clinical research. Public and Patient Involvement (PPI) can enhance the relevance and acceptability of research, however there is limited evidence on how best to co-develop tools to assess public understanding of sustainable clinical research. MethodsThis study is a two-phase protocol. Phase I involves the co-development of an anonymous online survey with PPI partners through two structured workshops. Survey themes, topics, questions and format will be agreed collaboratively, and the co-development process will be evaluated using qualitative data collected during the workshops. These data will be analysed thematically, using Braun & Clarkes (2006) framework. Phase II involves distribution of the survey to clinical research, patient and public networks using an online platform. Survey data will be analysed using descriptive statistics for quantitative data and inductive content analysis for qualitative responses. DiscussionThis study will generate a co-developed survey instrument and provide insights into public understanding of sustainable clinical research. Reporting on both the survey findings and the PPI co-development process will inform future research and support the development of sustainable research clinical practices.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Ethnicity and COVID-19 outcomes among healthcare workers in the United Kingdom: UK-REACH ethico-legal research, qualitative research on healthcare workers’ experiences, and stakeholder engagement protocol 95%
- Participatory research in health intervention studies involving migrants: a systematic review 95%
- How and why do Quality Circles work for General Practitioners - a realist approach 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 95%
- Knowledge mobilisation of rapid evidence reviews to inform health and social care policy and practice in a public health emergency: appraisal of the Wales COVID-19 Evidence Centre processes and impact, 2021-23 94%
- STIMULATE-ICP-Delphi (Symptoms, Trajectory, Inequalities and Management: Understanding Long-COVID to Address and Transform Existing Integrated Care Pathways Delphi): Study Protocol 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of a consensus extension of the estimands framework for cluster randomised trials (CRT-estimands): results from an international Delphi study 93%
- Development and evaluation of rapid data-enabled access to routine clinical information to enhance early recruitment to the national clinical platform trial of COVID-19 community treatments 93%
- Operational Strategies among Infectious Disease Clinical Trial Sites During Pandemics: A Scoping Review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving the impact of pharmacy interventions in hospitals 93%
- Improving local authority financial support services for users with complex health needs: a mixed-method economic evaluation of Social Navigators in South Tyneside, UK 92%
- National statutory reporting: not even ticking the boxes? The quality of ‘Learning from Deaths’ reporting in Quality Accounts within the NHS in England 2017-2020 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and psychometric testing of EPAT-16: A short and valid measure for patient-centeredness from the patient’s perspective 92%
- Trauma informed co-production: Collaborating and combining expertise to improve access to primary care with women with complex needs 92%
- “I don’t know what to do or where to go”. Experiences of accessing healthcare support from the perspectives of people living with Long Covid and healthcare professionals: A qualitative study in Bradford, UK 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.