Back

Co-developing a Survey on Public Understanding of Sustainable Clinical Research: A Study Protocol

Keegan, D.; ONeill, L.; Doran, P.

2026-01-23 health systems and quality improvement
10.64898/2026.01.21.26344584 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundClinical research is essential for medical advancement but contributes to carbon emissions through activities such as travel, data management, and laboratory processes. As healthcare systems move towards net-zero targets, there is a growing need to understand public awareness of and attitudes towards environmental sustainability in clinical research. Public and Patient Involvement (PPI) can enhance the relevance and acceptability of research, however there is limited evidence on how best to co-develop tools to assess public understanding of sustainable clinical research. MethodsThis study is a two-phase protocol. Phase I involves the co-development of an anonymous online survey with PPI partners through two structured workshops. Survey themes, topics, questions and format will be agreed collaboratively, and the co-development process will be evaluated using qualitative data collected during the workshops. These data will be analysed thematically, using Braun & Clarkes (2006) framework. Phase II involves distribution of the survey to clinical research, patient and public networks using an online platform. Survey data will be analysed using descriptive statistics for quantitative data and inductive content analysis for qualitative responses. DiscussionThis study will generate a co-developed survey instrument and provide insights into public understanding of sustainable clinical research. Reporting on both the survey findings and the PPI co-development process will inform future research and support the development of sustainable research clinical practices.

Published in PLOS ONE (predicted rank #2) · training set

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.