Back

Optimizing light environment enables speed breeding in forage legumes: physiological limits and generation time reduction in Medicago sativa and Medicago truncatula

Berais-Rubio, A.; Couture, C.; Rodriguez-Briosso, M.; Signorelli, S.

2026-01-23 plant biology
10.64898/2026.01.20.700577 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Climate change and increasing global demand for animal products are intensifying the need to accelerate genetic improvement of forage crops. Speed breeding (SB) has emerged as a powerful tool to shorten generation cycles; however, its application in perennial and autotetraploid forage legumes remains limited, particularly regarding reproductive performance and physiological constraints. Here, we optimized photoperiod, light intensity, and light quality to accelerate the life cycle of Medicago sativa (alfalfa) and its diploid relative Medicago truncatula under controlled conditions. We evaluated flowering, fruiting, seed harvest time, seed set, and germination across independent and combined SB treatments, and assessed photosynthetic performance to identify potential physiological trade-offs. Blue- red light supplementation, moderate-to-high irradiance (450 {micro}mol m-2 s-1), and extended photoperiods significantly accelerated reproductive development in both species, although optimal combinations differed between the diploid and autotetraploid backgrounds. A combined SB regime (20/4 h photoperiod at 450 {micro}mol m-2 s-1) reduced time to harvest by 17% in M. sativa and 28% in M. truncatula, while maintaining viable seed production. Chlorophyll fluorescence analysis revealed a higher photosynthetic plasticity in alfalfa compared with M. truncatula, indicating species-specific physiological limits to SB intensification. Our results establish practical SB conditions for alfalfa and an agronomically relevant M. truncatula genotype, providing an enabling platform to accelerate breeding cycles and trait evaluation in forage legumes.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.1%
2
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.3%
3
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
8.4%
4
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
7.0%
5
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.0%
7
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.1%
8
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.1%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
10
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
11
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
12
Plant Methods
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
13
Plant Science
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
14
The Plant Phenome Journal
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
Crop Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
17
The Plant Genome
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
18
Plant Communications
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
Physiologia Plantarum
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
20
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
21
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
22
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
24
G3
33 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
25
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%