Back

CRISPR-enhanced assessment of variants of unknown significance nominates oncology therapeutic targets and drug repositioning opportunities

Savino, A.; Oikonomou, A.; De Lucia, R. R.; Grau, M. L.; McCarten, K.; Najgebauer, H.; Perron, U.; Azzolin, L.; Livanova, A.; Cremaschi, P.; Lopez-Bigas, N.; Sottoriva, A.; Iorio, F.

2026-01-23 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.01.20.700565 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Identifying cancer driver genes and mutations remains a cornerstone of cancer research and a prerequisite for developing effective targeted therapies. While current approaches have successfully uncovered recurrent oncogenic alterations, they often miss rare or context specific events, leaving large segments of the mutational landscape of human cancers functionally uncharacterised. We developed a CRISPR enhanced analytical framework that systematically identifies Dependency-Associated Mutations (DAMs): somatic variants linked to increased viability dependency on their hosting gene in cancer cells. To this aim, we designed a rank based metric applicable even to singleton variants and analysed large scale functional genomics data from over a thousand cancer cell lines. We discovered more than 2,000 DAMs, involving more than 1,000 in genes not previously reported as cancer drivers. These unreported DAM bearing genes reinforce canonical oncogenic pathways, revealing overlooked but functionally coherent nodes. By integrating drug response profiles, patient mutation data, and functional impact predictions, we distilled these findings into a refined set of hundreds high priority DAMs: variants that are not only functionally impactful and recurrent in tumours, but also encode druggable proteins and exhibit strong potential for clinical translation. Comparative analyses revealed significant overlap with an independent study, underscoring the robustness and reproducibility of our approach. All results are available through the CRISPR VUS Portal (https://vus-portal.fht.org), an interactive resource for exploring mutation dependency relationships across cancer-types. Our findings expand the functional and therapeutic landscape of cancer genomics, providing a scalable framework to interpret non recurrent variants and systematically uncover novel cancer vulnerabilities. By linking mutational profiles to gene essentiality and pharmacological sensitivity, our work extends the reach of precision oncology beyond canonical cancer drivers.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.2%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 16%
10.5%
3
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.0%
5
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
6
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
7
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 7%
3.1%
8
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.4%
10
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
11
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 64%
1.3%
13
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 36%
1.3%
15
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.3%
16
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.2%
17
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
18
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
19
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.9%
20
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.9%
21
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.8%
23
Molecular Systems Biology
142 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
25
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.7%
26
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
27
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.6%
28
Cancer Discovery
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
30
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 37%
0.5%