Back

MoDPA: Inferring Modification-dependent Protein Associations from Uniformly Reprocessed Mass Spectrometry

Massignani, E.; Tichshenko, N.; Velghe, K.; Martens, L.

2026-01-21 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.01.20.700550 bioRxiv
Show abstract

MotivationPost-translational modifications (PTMs) are key regulators of protein function and cellular processes; however, the overall principles of PTM co-regulation and crosstalk remain to be fully understood. A major challenge in large-scale PTM crosstalk studies is the scarcity of data, which hampers the ability to reproducibly detect proteome-wide associations between modification sites. ResultsWe present a new computational framework, named Modification-Dependent Protein Associations (MoDPA). To overcome the extreme sparsity and heterogeneity of PTM calls across experiments, MoDPA utilizes a variational autoencoder (VAE) to embed per-site detection profiles into a low-dimensional latent space that preserves covariation while denoising missing data. A PTM association network is constructed by correlating latent representations across experiments. Benchmarking against pulsed SILAC data shows that MoDPA can correctly capture the correlation between heavy- and light-labelled peptides. We apply MoDPA to a large sample of reprocessed public datasets and identify clusters of modified proteins involved in distinct biological pathways, suggesting that some modifications may preferentially regulate specific biological processes, but not others. In particular, we find clusters enriched in lysine acetylation, lysine methylation, and arginine deamidation (citrullination) sites, which contain proteins involved in protein synthesis, neuron development, and cellular senescence. Availability and ImplementationAll code is freely available on GitHub (https://github.com/CompOmics/MoDPAv1.0) and Zenodo (10.5281/zenodo.18310674). The resulting MoDPA-derived PTM network is available via the TabloidProteome website at https://iomics.ugent.be/tabloidproteome. Contactenrico.massignani@ugent.be, lennart.martens@ugent.be

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.