Conversational, Longitudinal, Ecological Assessment (CLEA): Exploring a new AI-driven method for qualitative data collection in a behavioural health context
Downes, S.; Krys, T.; O'Hara, K.; Western, M.; Thompson, L.; Brigden, A.
Show abstract
In this paper, we present conversational longitudinal ecological assessment (CLEA), a novel conversational AI-enabled method for collecting ecologically valid, temporally sensitive qualitative health data via mobile instant messaging. We report findings from an exploratory deployment of an instantiation of CLEA within a 12-week community-based weight management programme, delivered by a charity partner in an area of deprivation. Using WhatsApp, we deployed our CLEA chat-agent to conduct twice-weekly conversational data collection sessions with participants, to elicit data about their experience of the programme and associated behaviour change. This was followed by in-person semi-structured interviews (N = 9) to examine user experiences and perceptions of interacting with the chat-agent. Participants reported that WhatsApps familiarity supported accessibility and sustained engagement, while the conversational format encouraged reflection directed towards the research focus. Responding to chat-agent prompts required cognitive effort, leading some participants to defer engagement until they had adequate time and mental space; however, this reflective demand was largely experienced as beneficial within the programme context. The AIs quasi-human interactional qualities fostered a sense of support while reducing social judgement, enabling more candid disclosure. Together, these findings demonstrate initial feasibility and acceptability of CLEA for longitudinal qualitative data collection in an underserved population, and illustrate its capacity to elicit meaningful, contextually grounded insights consistently over time, that can be used in the formative stage of digital health intervention development. The study highlights both the opportunities and trade-offs of conversational AI for qualitative data collection, including design implications for health researchers looking to implement or extend the method. Finally, we position CLEA in relation to other longitudinal methods of health data elicitation. Author summaryDeveloping effective interventions for health behaviours such as healthy eating and physical activity requires methods that can capture the complex, individual factors shaping peoples everyday experiences, including stress and motivation. Because such factors often fluctuate over time, longitudinal approaches are needed to understand how experiences and behaviours unfold in real-world contexts. For such methods to be effective, they must also be acceptable, engaging, and accessible--particularly for underserved or disadvantaged populations who are disproportionately affected by health-related conditions such as obesity. In this study, we introduce conversational longitudinal ecological assessment (CLEA), a digital health method that uses conversational AI technology to collect ecologically valid qualitative data over time through an accessible communication platform. We demonstrate the feasibility, acceptability, and utility of CLEA through a real-world deployment investigating an underserved groups experience of a community-based weight management programme. To support other health researchers, we position CLEA in relation to existing longitudinal methods and highlight the key design considerations that shape engagement, data quality, and participant experience.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 95%
- Exploring perspectives on digital smoking cessation just-in-time adaptive interventions: A focus group study with adult smokers and smoking cessation professionals 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The experiences of 33 national COVID-19 dashboard teams during the first year of the pandemic in the WHO European Region: a qualitative study 94%
- Validating a Clinical Decision Support System for Palliative Care using healthcare professionals’ insights 94%
- A digital self-care intervention for Ugandan patients with heart failure and their clinicians: User-centred design and usability study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- From many voices, one question: Community co-design of a population-based qualitative cancer research study 95%
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 94%
- “Endless Opportunities”: A qualitative exploration of facilitators and barriers to scale-up of two-way texting follow-up after voluntary medical male circumcision in Zimbabwe 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based Chatbots in Promoting Health Behavioral Changes: A Systematic Review 96%
- Tracking private WhatsApp discourse about COVID-19: A longitudinal infodemiology study in Singapore 95%
- Improving Patient Engagement in Phase 2 Clinical Trials with a Trial-specific Patient Decision Aid (tPDA): A Development and Usability Study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The development of a World Health Organization transdiagnostic chatbot intervention for distressed adolescents and young adults 95%
- Leveraging Telemedicine To Improve Mnch Uptake In Kenya: A Community- Based Hybrid Model 95%
- Implementing Home-Based Digital Health in Rural Canada: A Scoping Review 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.