Back

Utility of polygenic risk scores in diagnostic genetic testing for dilated cardiomyopathy

Chowdhury, U. N.; Giannoulatou, E. N.; Fatkin, D.; Atherton, J. J.; Palpant, N. J.; Couvy-Duchesne, B.; Shah, S.

2026-01-22 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.01.20.26344484
Show abstract

Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a major driver of heart failure and transplantation. Despite its strong genetic basis, clinical genetic testing identifies pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants in only about one-third of cases. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) indicate that common variants also contribute to genetic risk, but utility of polygenic risk score (PRS) for diagnostic testing is unclear. We derived a DCM PRS from a large GWAS and applied it to 113 Australian Genomics Health Alliance (AGHA) participants of genetically determined European ancestry with clinically diagnosed DCM, with most having a family history of disease. Genetic testing identified a P/LP variant in 34% of patients. Using 450,280 UK Biobank participants of European ancestry as a reference, we selected the best performing PRS (SBayesRC; odds ratio per SD increase in PRS = 1.72, 95% CI 1.58-1.88). We compared the PRS of individuals with a P/LP variant in the TTN gene (TTN_G+) or other genes (nonTTN_G+), and in those without any P/LP or variants of unknown significance identified (G-). Relative to the UK Biobank reference, median PRS values were significantly higher in G- and TTN_G+ groups. Twenty-six percent of G- and 25% of TTN_G+ cases were in the top decile, versus 11% of nonTTN_G+ cases. Notably, TTN_G+ cases were absent from the lowest four deciles. These findings support a substantial polygenic contribution in DCM patients without identifiable monogenic variants as well as in TTN-related DCM. Incorporating PRS alongside routine genetic testing could increase diagnostic yield and inform risk management for patients and families.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
based on 30 papers
Top 0.3%
13.3%
2
The American Journal of Human Genetics
based on 77 papers
Top 1%
11.2%
3
Nature Genetics
based on 72 papers
Top 2%
10.2%
4
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 11%
7.6%
5
Genome Medicine
based on 56 papers
Top 0.9%
7.6%
6
Genetics in Medicine
based on 57 papers
Top 2%
5.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
Circulation
based on 37 papers
Top 3%
3.0%
8
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 55%
2.8%
9
Nature
based on 58 papers
Top 2%
2.8%
10
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
based on 11 papers
Top 0.3%
2.8%
11
Human Molecular Genetics
based on 28 papers
Top 1%
2.5%
12
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
based on 39 papers
Top 0.9%
2.3%
13
Human Genetics
based on 14 papers
Top 0.8%
1.3%
14
PLOS Genetics
based on 39 papers
Top 4%
1.3%
15
Cell Genomics
based on 34 papers
Top 4%
0.8%
16
npj Genomic Medicine
based on 18 papers
Top 3%
0.8%
17
Nature Medicine
based on 88 papers
Top 16%
0.8%
18
European Journal of Human Genetics
based on 25 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
19
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 95%
0.8%
20
Human Genomics
based on 13 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Human Mutation
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
22
International Journal of Epidemiology
based on 65 papers
Top 10%
0.7%
23
Brain
based on 69 papers
Top 8%
0.7%
24
Journal of the American Heart Association
based on 92 papers
Top 12%
0.7%