Camera-Agnostic Autonomous Diagnosis of Glaucomatous Optic Neuropathy using Macular Fundus Imaging and Machine Learning
Dvey-Aharon, Z.; Lalman, C.; Ianchulev, T.; Livne, M.; Margalit, D.; Aviv, R.; Mendoza, K. A. V.; Schuman, J. S.
Show abstract
PurposeGlaucoma, a leading cause of irreversible vision loss, often remains undiagnosed due to its asymptomatic progression and the limitations of existing screening methods. This study aimed to validate an artificial intelligence machine learning algorithm for the camera-agnostic detection of glaucomatous optic neuropathy using macula-centered fundus images. MethodsData were collected from EyePACS, a teleretinal screening system, comprising 25,000 macula-centered fundus images from 12,500 patients at U.S. primary care centers. A secondary dataset from the Philadelphia Telemedicine Glaucoma Follow-up Study was used for independent validation. A convolutional neural network was developed to detect glaucomatous optic neuropathy. Expert-graded fundus images served as the ground truth. Images underwent quality filtering to ensure the visibility of the optic nerve. Bilateral images were analyzed to produce patient-level diagnoses. Validation involved a secondary dataset of fundus images. ResultsThe sensitivity and specificity of the algorithm in detecting glaucomatous optic neuropathy is calculated in comparison to expert grading. From the EyePACS dataset, 21,792 images (10,986 subjects) met quality standards. The algorithm demonstrated a sensitivity of 90.6% and specificity of 90.5%. Validation on the secondary dataset (200 fundus images from 100 subjects) resulted in a sensitivity of 96.4% and specificity of 85.3%. ConclusionsThe algorithm achieved high sensitivity and specificity in detecting glaucomatous optic neuropathy using macula-centered fundus images, demonstrating its potential for integration into diverse clinical settings. Its camera-agnostic design and robust performance offer a scalable solution for improving glaucoma screening pathways, making them more accessible and efficient.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Relating Standardized Automated Perimetry Performed with Stimulus Sizes III and V in Eyes With Field Loss due to Glaucoma and NAION 97%
- Rates of Glaucoma Progression Derived from Linear Mixed Models Using Varied Random Effect Distributions 97%
- Visual field evaluation using Zippy Adaptive Threshold Algorithm (ZATA) Standard and ZATA Fast in patients with glaucoma and healthy individuals 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated Expert-level Scleral Spur Detection and Quantitative Biometric Analysis on the ANTERION Anterior Segment OCT System 97%
- Macula structural and vascular differences in glaucoma eyes with and without high axial myopia 97%
- Risk Model for Intraoperative Complication during Cataract Surgery Based on Data from 900,000 Eyes – Previous Intravitreal Injection is a Risk Factor 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of OCT biomarker changes in treatment-naive neovascular AMD using a deep semantic segmentation algorithm 96%
- Dense Optic Nerve Head Deformation Estimated using CNN as a Structural Biomarker of Glaucoma Progression 95%
- Automated vision screening of children using a mobile graphic device 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Diagnostic performance of multifocal photopic negative response, pattern electroretinogram and optical coherence tomography in glaucoma 96%
- Optimizing the Characterization and Quantification of Retinal Ganglion Cell Somas in Healthy and Injured Retinas Using Cellpose 94%
- Lamina cribrosa vessel and collagen beam networks are distinct 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.