Back

3D Microscale Mechanical Simulations of Hydrogel Coated Electrospun Meshes

He, E.; Motiwale, S.; Cosgriff-Hernandez, E.; Sacks, M. S.

2026-01-22 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.01.19.700377 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Electrospun fiber meshes have long served as biomaterials in a wide range of biomedical applications due to their functional similarities to extracellular matrix and highly tunable properties. Altering the mechanical behaviors of individual fibers and their microarchitecture (e.g.; diameter, crimp, orientation, density) can in principle be used to control bulk level behaviors. Moreover, electrospun meshes are often combined with softer coatings and hydrogels to control surface interactions with body tissues. Yet, fully optimizing their behaviors for specific applications remains an elusive target due to a continued lack of understanding of the micromechanical mechanisms and their relation to bulk mechanical behaviors. Our goal herein was to understand how actual nanoCT-generated 3D microfiber geometry can be used to predict bulk mechanical properties of hydrogel-mesh composites. Electrospun polyurethane meshes were fabricated with a random fiber orientation and coated with a PEG-based hydrogel. The fiber-hydrogel composite was then imaged with a nanoCT scanner at a voxel resolution of 180 nm. From these images, custom Python programs were written to segment, refine, and tesselate a high-resolution finite element of the fiber mesh and hydrogel volumes into a single integrated bi-material finite element model. The resulting mesh was used to run simulations of the planar biaxial mechanical tests used to characterize the bulk mechanical behaviors. Our framework thus enabled systematic investigations of both the macroscopic bulk mechanical response of the overall fiber mesh and the microscopic localized mechanical response of fibers under various stages of loading. The resultant simulations were accurate and predictive of the bulk mechanical responses. It is interesting to note that the fiber-hydrogel composite material experienced the largest stresses within the fiber phase and the largest strains within the hydrogel. This key result underscores that while the previous analytical model assumed local affine deformations, at the microscale this assumption does not hold. We also found very different effective fiber stress-strain responses in each model. It is likely these differences are due to the substantial heterogeneous non-affine local deformations present in the actual fiber-hydrogel composite. This finding further reveals the need for more rigorous approaches to better understand how electrospun-based materials function in order to improve their use in modern medical devices and implants.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
41.7%
2
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
3
Biomaterials Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.9%
5
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
6
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.8%
7
Biomaterials Advances
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
8
ACS Applied Bio Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
9
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
10
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
11
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
12
Advanced Materials
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.7%
14
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.6%
15
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.4%
16
APL Bioengineering
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
17
Advanced Materials Technologies
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
18
Tissue Engineering Part A
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
19
Advanced Materials Interfaces
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
20
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.8%
21
Materials Today Bio
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
22
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.8%
24
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
25
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
26
Small
70 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
28
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
Nanoscale
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
30
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%