Back

Replication Challenges in Linking Personality to Resting-State Functional Connectomics

Jajcay, N.; Tomecek, D.; Fajnerova, I.; Rydlo, J.; Tintera, J.; Horacek, J.; Lukavsky, J.; Hlinka, J.

2026-01-21 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.01.19.700331 bioRxiv
Show abstract

An increasing number of studies are currently focusing on personality neuroscience, a term denoting the research aimed at neuroimaging correlates of inter-individual temperament and character variability. Among other methods, a graph theoretical analysis of the functional connectivity in resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data was applied in a study by Gao et al. (2013), reporting novel functional connectivity correlates of personality traits. The current paper presents a conceptual replication of the results of this study and discusses the related challenges, including an extension of the original statistical methods in order to illustrate the effect of the multiple comparison problem. Five personality dimensions were obtained using the revised Big Five Personality Inventory, including scores of Extraversion and Neuroticism covered in the original paper. Using a larger sample (84 subjects) with adequate statistical power (ranging from 0.75 to 0.95 across analyses), we failed to replicate any of the nine specific neuroimaging correlates of personality presented by Gao et al. While acknowledging differences in the experimental procedures, we discuss that the lack of replication might be caused by the relatively liberal control of false positives in the original study. Indeed, the original testing scheme leads to an expected count of about 10 false positive observations among all tests; applying this scheme to our data we observed a similar number of positive tests, albeit for different relations. No significant correlations were found in our data when standard family-wise error control was applied. These results illustrate the importance of combining exploration with independent validation, use of large datasets, as well as appropriate control of multiple comparison problem in order to prevent false alarms in research into neural substrates of personality differences. Importantly, our findings do not disprove the existence of a link between personality and the brains intrinsic functional architecture; but rather suggest that such a link might be even more subtle and elusive than previously reported.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
22.3%
2
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
8.3%
3
Brain Structure and Function
83 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
4
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
5
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.8%
6
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.9%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.6%
10
Brain Topography
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
11
Brain Connectivity
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
12
Frontiers in Neuroimaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
13
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
14
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.3%
15
Neuroinformatics
40 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
16
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
17
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
81 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
18
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.1%
19
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
20
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
24
Brain Imaging and Behavior
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
25
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
26
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Brain Research
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.6%