Back

Time-Resolved Resonance Raman Spectroscopy of Retinal Proteins with Continuous-Wave Excitation. A Fundamental Methodology Revisited.

Hildebrandt, P.; Schaefer, A. L.; Gellini, C.; Diller, R.; Kuhlmann, U.; Forest, K. T.

2026-01-21 biophysics
10.64898/2026.01.18.700169 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Time-resolved resonance Raman spectroscopy with continuous-wave excitation is a fundamental technique that has contributed substantially to the understanding of structure and dynamics of bacteriorhodopsin and related retinal proteins. However, the underlying principles were developed about fifty years ago for instrumentation that is hardly in use any more. Thus, the adaptation of the technique to current state-of-the art equipment is needed to satisfy the increasing demand for the spectroscopic characterization of microbial retinal proteins. In this work, we focus on pump-probe time-resolved resonance Raman experiments with a confocal spectrometer using a rotating cell. We discuss the boundary conditions that fulfill the fresh sample conditions and the photochemical innocence of the probe beam as a prerequisite for studying parent or intermediate states of retinal proteins that undergo a cyclic photoinduced reaction sequence. For the measurements of intermediate states and reaction kinetics, pump-probe experiments are required in which the two laser beams hit the flowing sample with a defined but variable delay time. An appropriate set-up for such two-beam experiments with a confocal spectrometer is proposed and tested in time-resolved experiments of bacteriorhodopsin. The comparison with the results obtained with previous classical slit spectrometers with 90-degree-scattering illustrates the advantages and disadvantages of the confocal arrangement. It is shown that modern confocal spectrometers substantially decrease the spectra acquisition time but require a more demanding optical set-up. Furthermore, the extent of photoconversion by the pump beam is lower than for the 90-degree-scattering arrangement which lowers the accuracy of kinetic measurements.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 6%
10.2%
2
The European Physical Journal Plus
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.5%
4
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.4%
5
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
6
Journal of Biomedical Optics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
7
Journal of Biophotonics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
8
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
9
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.8%
10
The Journal of Chemical Physics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
50% of probability mass above
11
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
12
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
13
Biophysical Reports
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
Chemical Communications
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
17
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.5%
18
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
19
European Biophysics Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
20
Nanoscale Advances
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
21
Analytica Chimica Acta
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
22
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
23
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
24
Talanta
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
25
Optics Express
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
26
RSC Advances
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
68 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
29
Langmuir
31 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
30
Journal of the Royal Society Interface
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%