Back

Precision Evolutionary Medicine: A Computational Graph-Theoretical Framework For Pathogen-Specific Antibiotic Cycling In Multi-Drug-Resistant Gram-Negative Infections

Shuaibu, I. I.; Khan, M. A.; Alkhamis, D.; Alkhamis, A.; Ahmad, M. I.

2026-01-18 microbiology
10.64898/2026.01.18.700135 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe Proliferation of Multi-drug resistant (MDP) ESKAPE pathogens threatens to compromise the efficacy of standard antibiotic pharmacopoeia. Current antimicrobial stewardship strategies predominantly rely on reactive antibiograms selecting therapeutic agents based on immediate phenotypic susceptibility. This approach, while clinically expedient, often inadvertently selects for cross-resistance, driving the evolutionary trajectory toward pan-drug resistance. A paradigm shift is required toward predictive strategies that exploit evolutionary trade-offs, specifically Collateral Sensitivity (CS), where the acquisition of resistance to one agent induces hypersensitivity to another. MethodsWe developed a computational graph-theory framework to map the evolutionary trajectories of three critical Gram-negative pathogens: Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Drawing upon validated CS interaction matrices from experimental evolution literature, we constructed directed weighted graphs where nodes represent antibiotics and edges represent evolutionary sensitivity trade-offs. A closed-loop cycle optimization algorithm was deployed to identify pathogen-specific "Trap Loops" sequences of three or more antibiotics that force the pathogen into a state of high sensitivity. These loops were validated via stochastic in-silico clinical trials simulating 18 months of treatment, explicitly modeling clinical error and biological noise. ResultsThe model identified distinct, optimal cycling protocols for each pathogen. For E. coli, an Aminoglycoside-Beta Lactam loop (Gentamicin to Cefuroxime to Fosfomycin) demonstrated sustained suppression of resistance accumulation in silico. For K. pneumoniae, a novel Rifampicin to Doxycycline to Colistin loop was identified. For P. aeruginosa, a Tobramycin to Ciprofloxacin to Piperacillin sequence proved optimal. Stochastic simulations demonstrated that while standard reactive care resulted in progressive resistance accumulation (Normalized Resistance > 2.5), the graph-optimized protocols suppressed resistance within the therapeutic window (Normalized Resistance < 0.2) for the duration of the simulation. ConclusionWe demonstrate, through computational modeling, that antibiotic resistance trajectories can be strategically constrained by optimizing the temporal sequence of existing agents. This study provides a computational framework to inform the transition from reactive prescribing toward precision evolutionary steering. These protocols are intended to complement, not replace, clinical judgment and local antibiograms, particularly regarding pharmacokinetic constraints.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
19.1%
2
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.7%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 21%
8.7%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 22%
5.0%
5
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.1%
6
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
8
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
9
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
10
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.9%
11
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
12
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
13
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.7%
15
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
17
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
18
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
19
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.9%
21
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
22
Infectious Disease Modelling
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
26
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.8%
27
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%
28
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
30
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%