General healthcare preferences for people aged 50 and over in England: English Longitudinal Study of Ageing
Steel, N.; Zaninotto, P.; Enwo, O. O.; James, B.
Show abstract
BackgroundTreatment outcomes and satisfaction improve when healthcare decisions align with patient preferences. However, little is known about general health preferences in older adults, and eliciting patient preferences is time consuming. AimTo describe the distribution of preferences for healthcare in general, and associations between preferences and patient characteristics in adults aged 50 years and over in England. Design and settingData were collected in wave 8 (2016/2017) of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA), a biennial longitudinal survey of people aged 50 and over living in private households in England that began in 2002/2003 and is designed to be nationally representative. MethodData were collected from ELSA participants using face-to-face interviews and a short self completion questionnaire. Amongst other items, the questionnaire contained six new measures of general healthcare preferences: risk aversion, future orientation, quality or length of life, body function compared to looks, openness to experimental treatments, and preference to leave treatment decisions to a doctor. ResultsHealthcare preferences varied substantially, with some systematic patterns by age and sex: women were less likely than men to want to delegate decisions to doctors, and more likely to prioritise quality of life over length of life; participants aged over 75 years were more likely than younger participants to want to delegate decisions to doctors, and more likely to want to avoid risks. ConclusionThe systematic sex and age differences offer a useful starting point for eliciting healthcare preferences in a busy clinical environment, but cannot replace asking about individual preferences.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Which factors should be included in triage? An online survey of the attitudes of the UK general public to pandemic triage dilemmas 95%
- The Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam COVID-19 exposure index: a cross-sectional analysis of the impact of the pandemic on daily functioning of older adults 94%
- Public acceptability of non-pharmaceutical interventions to control a pandemic in the United Kingdom: a discrete choice experiment 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of COVID-19 lockdown on psychosocial factors, health, and lifestyle in Scottish octogenarians: the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 Study 95%
- What matters to patients?: a timely question for Value Based Care 94%
- Uncertainty in serious illness: A national interdisciplinary consensus exercise to identify clinical research priorities 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Impact of COVID-19 on Adjusted Mortality Risk in Care Homes for Older Adults in Wales, United Kingdom: A retrospective population-based cohort study for mortality in 2016-2020 93%
- Frailty is a predictor of medication-related harm requiring healthcare utilisation: a multicentre prospective cohort study 93%
- Impact of COVID-19 on Care-Home Mortality and Life Expectancy in Scotland 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Financial Hardship and Social Assistance as Determinants of Mental Health and Food and Housing Insecurity During the COVID-19 Pandemic 90%
- Low uptake of COVID-19 prevention behaviours and high socioeconomic impact of lockdown measures in South Asia: evidence from a large-scale multi-country surveillance programme 90%
- The COVID-19 pandemic and temporal change in metabolic risk factors for cardiovascular disease: a natural experiment within the HELIUS study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Socio-demographic inequalities in COVID-19 health care access and experiences in the United Kingdom: intersectional and mixed-methods analyses of open and closed questions in a prospective cohort study 93%
- Challenges of visibility and inclusion in Long COVID: a population-based interview study 92%
- Development and psychometric testing of EPAT-16: A short and valid measure for patient-centeredness from the patient’s perspective 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.