Using Natural Language Processing of Clinical Notes to Supplement Structured Electronic Health Record Data for Phenotyping Smoking and Obesity in a Healthcare System
Yang, J.; Gu, B.; Pillai, H.; Lii, J.; Cronkite, D.; Marsolo, K. A.; Desai, R. J.
Show abstract
PurposeStudies based on electronic health records (EHR) often rely on structured data, which may incompletely capture important clinical phenotypes in EHR notes. The purpose of this study was to assess two natural language processing (NLP) tools to extract phenotypes from unstructured EHR notes, and to evaluate the added value of integrating NLP-derived phenotypes with structured EHR data at a health system scale. MethodsThis retrospective study is based on inpatient and outpatient EHR data from the Mass General Brigham healthcare system between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2020. Two established rule-based NLP tools were applied to extract smoking and obesity information from 19,215,303 clinical notes of 503,025 patients. NLP performance was evaluated through manual review of stratified samples. Phenotype prevalence was estimated using structured EHR data alone and compared with prevalence estimates obtained by supplementing structured data with NLP-derived features. ResultsBoth NLP tools exhibited high performance, with both accuracy and F1 score of 0.99 for smoking, and 0.92 and 0.91 for obesity, respectively. The combination of NLP and structured data identified 220,714 patients (43.88%) with smoking, compared with 170,396 patients (33.87%) identified using structured data alone, representing a 29.5% relative increase. For obesity, NLP identified 121,360 patients (24.12%) from EHR notes, and 169,905 patients (33.78%) were documented in structured data; inclusion of NLP-derived features contributed additional 32,823 patients, corresponding to a 19.3% relative increase. ConclusionNLP-derived phenotypes from unstructured EHR notes substantially improve patient identification for both smoking and obesity compared with structured EHR data alone at scale.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Large Language Models Facilitate the Generation of Electronic Health Record Phenotyping Algorithms 95%
- Development and Validation of Phenotype Classifiers across Multiple Sites in the Observational Health Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI) Network 94%
- Machine Learning Approaches for Electronic Health Records Phenotyping: A Methodical Review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and Application of Pharmacological Statin-Associated Muscle Symptoms Phenotyping Algorithms Using Structured and Unstructured Electronic Health Records Data 93%
- Transforming Estonian health data to the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) Common Data Model: lessons learned 93%
- Enhancing Research Data Infrastructure to Address the Opioid Epidemic: The Opioid Overdose Network (02-Net) 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of a Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) Symptom Lexicon Using Electronic Health Record Clinical Notes 95%
- ConceptWAS: a high-throughput method for early identification of COVID-19 presenting symptoms 94%
- Natural language processing for scalable feature engineering and ultra-high-dimensional confounding adjustment in healthcare database studies 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting critical state after COVID-19 diagnosis: Model development using a large US electronic health record dataset 92%
- Adoption of the OMOP CDM for Cancer Research using Real-world Data: Current Status and Opportunities 92%
- Zero-shot Interpretable Phenotyping of Postpartum Hemorrhage Using Large Language Models 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Developing and Evaluating Mappings of ICD-10 and ICD-10-CM Codes to PheCodes 94%
- Extracting social determinants of health from electronic health records: development and comparison of rule-based and large language models-based methods 93%
- Is the quality of hospital EHR data sufficient to evidence its ICHOM outcomes performance in heart failure? A pilot evaluation 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.