Back

Fundamental limitations of genomic language models for realistic sequence generation

Tzanakakis, A.; Mouratidis, I.; Georgakopoulos-Soares, I.

2026-01-18 synthetic biology
10.64898/2026.01.17.700093 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable success in natural language processing, prompting interest in their application to genomic sequence analysis. Genomic Language Models (gLMs) based on similar architectures offer a promising avenue for synthetic genome generation and characterization. However, their effectiveness for biological sequence modeling remains poorly characterized. We present a comprehensive evaluation of genomic language models that explicitly aim to generate entire synthetic genomes. We tested Evo 2 on diverse prokaryotic, eukaryotic and viral genomes, and megaDNA on bacteriophage genomes, and assessed performance across key biological features and organizational patterns. Our results reveal systematic failures in gLM-based genomic reconstruction. While the synthetic sequences captured local sequence statistics, they consistently failed to preserve long-range genomic organization, repeat and k-mer composition, transcription factor binding site architecture, and evolutionary constraints. Generated sequences exhibited violations of natural genomic patterns and models showed particular difficulty with repetitive elements. To assess the quality of genome generation, we trained a convolutional neural network that reliably distinguished synthetic from natural sequences, achieving AUROC values up to 0.97 in eukaryotes and 0.82 in prokaryotes, with classification accuracy increasing monotonically with genomic distance from the seed. These findings suggest fundamental limitations in current gLM architectures for capturing the long-range, hierarchical nature of genomic sequences. Our work highlights the need for specialized architectures that explicitly model evolutionary constraints rather than relying solely on statistical patterns, with important implications for computational biology applications requiring realistic sequence generation and for biosafety assessments that depend on the distinguishability of synthetic and natural genomic sequences.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 1%
18.3%
2
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 3%
10.3%
3
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.3%
4
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.2%
5
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.8%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 36%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
8
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
9
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
10
Nature Computational Science
50 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
11
Synthetic Biology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
12
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.0%
13
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.0%
14
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.0%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 51%
2.0%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 30%
1.9%
17
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
18
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
19
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
20
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
21
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
22
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.2%
23
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
24
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.9%
25
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
Bioinformatics Advances
184 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.6%
28
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.6%