Back

Wildfire, restoration, and post-wildfire rehabilitation effects on wind erosion in the Great Basin

Treminio, R.; Webb, N. P.; Edwards, B. L.; Newingham, B. A.; Garbowski, M.; Brungard, C.; Dubois, D.; Faist, A.; Kachergis, E.; Houdeshell, C.-A.

2026-01-20 ecology
10.64898/2026.01.16.699976 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Restoration of degraded areas and post-disturbance rehabilitation after wildfire encompass critical approaches for reducing and reversing impacts of wind erosion and sand and dust storms (SDS). However, the broad outcomes of dryland restoration and rehabilitation for wind erosion and SDS remain underexplored. Wind erosion is an emerging issue in the Great Basin of the western United States, exacerbated by invasive annual grasses and associated wildfire. Here, we assess potential wind erosion and SDS responses to wildfire, restoration, and post-wildfire rehabilitation treatments at the regional scale in the Great Basin. We used 13 years of rangeland monitoring data, the Aeolian EROsion model, and the Land Treatment Digital Library to produce counterfactual model-predictions to estimate treatment effects. Our results revealed reductions in aeolian sediment fluxes (Ln Q < 0 g m-1 d-1) across wildfire-affected regions (mean {+/-} SE: -0.070 {+/-} 0.077 Ln Q), restoration treatments in unburned areas (range: -0.867 {+/-} 0.398 to 0.480 {+/-} 0.253 Ln Q), and post-wildfire rehabilitation (range: -0.821 {+/-} 0.183 to 1.278 {+/-} 0.909 Ln Q). In particular, aerial seeding and soil disturbance restoration treatments, and post-wildfire closure-treatments had higher perennial grass cover and the most decreased Ln Q compared to untreated controls. These results represent an important regional scale assessment of wind erosion responses to restoration and post-wildfire rehabilitation. Our findings underscore the application of integrating wind erosion and SDS mitigation into restoration and post-disturbance rehabilitation programs to provide land managers with strategies to reduce land degradation while fostering ecosystem resilience.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.9%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 16%
11.9%
3
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
4
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
5
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.9%
6
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Forest Ecology and Management
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
8
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
9
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
10
Landscape Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
11
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.3%
12
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.3%
13
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.7%
15
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
17
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
18
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.6%
19
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
20
GeoHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
21
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
22
FACETS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
23
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
24
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
25
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
26
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
27
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
28
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
29
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%