Back

Integrating Acoustic, Prosodic, and Phonological Features for Automatic Alzheimer's Detection

Kurdi, M. Z.

2026-01-21 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.01.16.699892 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Early and accurate diagnosis of Alzheimers Disease (AD) is critical for effective intervention. While previous studies have explored speech-based biomarkers for AD, this paper presents the first systematic investigation of acoustic, prosodic, and phonological speech features for detecting this neurocognitive disorder. Our study has two main objectives: (1) to assess the individual impact of AD on a wide range of speech features, and (2) to identify the most informative feature subsets using a combination of four feature ranking methods and seven machine learning classifiers. We conducted our experiments using the publicly available ADReSS Challenge dataset, allowing for direct comparison with prior speech-based approaches. Our analysis focused on continuous acoustic and prosodic measures as well as discrete phonological features, both independently and in combination. The best performance, with an F1-score of 0.89, was achieved using the optimal subset of acoustic features with ensemble learning and by integrating all three feature types, suggesting that combining continuous and categorical speech features offers complementary diagnostic value. This approach surpasses all previous speech-only methods in the ADReSS Challenge and comes close to the best reported overall result from the campaigns dataset, even without using lexical information. The results were further validated through positive outcomes on the Delaware corpus (focused on MCI) and a set of speeches from President Ronald Reagan (who was diagnosed with Alzheimers). These findings suggest that speech patterns, beyond just the content, are more indicative of Alzheimers disease than previously thought, underscoring the potential of multi-layered speech analysis for non-invasive AD detection.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.1%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 7%
10.1%
3
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.3%
5
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
52 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.9%
6
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.3%
7
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
8
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
9
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
10
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
11
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
12
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
15
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.3%
16
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
17
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
18
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
19
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
38 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
20
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.9%
21
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.9%
22
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
24
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
26
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
27
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.7%
29
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
30
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%