COLLEMBOT: AI-Based Counting of Collembola for OECD 232 Tests
Wehrli, M.; Meyer, A. F.; Souza da Silva, E.; van Loon, S.; van Hall, B. G.; van Gestel, C. A. M.; Natal-da-Luz, T.; Doering, M. V. R.; Feldhaar, H.; Mair, M.; Jordan, D.; Langer, M.
Show abstract
Ecotoxicological tests with soil organisms, such as the collembolan Folsomia candida, are essential for assessing chemical risks in terrestrial ecosystems. However, the current Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) 232 reproduction tests rely on manual counting of juvenile and adult Collembola, a process that is costly, labor-intensive, time-consuming and prone to operator bias. These limitations restrict data availability and hinder robust risk assessments. We therefore developed COLLEMBOT, an automated counting tool based on a YOLOv11 convolutional neural network, designed to integrate seamlessly into OECD workflows without protocol modifications. The model was trained on high-resolution images (n = 3207) from multiple laboratories and validated using 22 independent datasets (n = 1704 images) from Amsterdam (Netherlands), Basel (Switzerland), Bayreuth (Germany), Coimbra (Portugal) and Aarhus (Denmark). Datasets consisted of relevant standard soils (OECD artificial soils with 2.5%, 5% and 10% sphagnum peat; LUFA 2.2) and the springtail Folsomia candida. Automated counts showed strong agreement with manual counts (R{superscript 2} = 0.88-0.99). Dose-response curves derived from automated and manual counts strongly overlapped and effect concentrations (EC and EC) differed minimally (Median %{Delta} 6.2 {+/-} 23 and EC10 - EC90 R2 [≥] 0.977), remaining within acceptable limits for regulatory risk assessment and confirming reliability. Time efficiency improved significantly: a test with [~]300 images and up to 1,500 individuals per image was processed in less than 3 hours, compared to [~]137 hours needed for manual counting, a reduction of approximately 97%. By reducing labor and improving reproducibility, COLLEMBOT enables broader hazard data generation for collembolans, supporting science-based chemical risk assessment. The code and workflow are publicly available to facilitate adoption and community-driven development. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=187 SRC="FIGDIR/small/697653v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (131K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1d3ddc5org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@84c90aorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1aaf06aorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@18ddfcd_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Bacterial community characterization by deep learning aided image analysis in soil chips 94%
- Using machine learning to count Antarctic shag (Leucocarbo bransfieldensis) nests on images captured by Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems 93%
- A workflow for microclimate sensor networks: integrating geographic tools, statistics, and local knowledge 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Hierarchizing multi-scale environmental effects on agricultural pest population dynamics: a case study on the annual onset of Bactrocera dorsalis population growth in Senegalese orchards 91%
- A pipeline for assessing the quality of iNaturalist data and images and the importance of metadata and image quality control when using crowd-sourced databases. 91%
- Spatio-temporal dynamics of attacks around deaths of wolves: A statistical assessment of lethal control efficiency in France 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving deep learning-based segmentation of diatoms in gigapixel-sized virtual slides by object-based tile positioning and object integrity constraint 95%
- Open Soil Spectral Library (OSSL): Building reproducible soil calibration models through open development and community engagement 93%
- Insect Detect: An open-source DIY camera trap for automated insect monitoring 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.