Healthcare-related sociocultural factors, racial disparities, and kidney transplant outcomes in the Kidney Transplant Fast Track program
Velez-Bermudez, M.; Leyva, Y.; Puttarajappa, C.; Kalaria, A.; Zhu, Y.; Ng, Y.-H.; Unruh, M.; Boulware, L. E.; Tevar, A.; Dew, M. A.; Myaskovsky, L.
Show abstract
Background In the United States, streamlining the kidney transplantation (KT) evaluation process may reduce disparities and barriers to KT access. Prior work showed that the Kidney Transplant Fast Track (KTFT) program shortened this process and reduced racial disparities in waitlisting and overall KT. However, within a setting where evaluation-related structural barriers have been addressed, a comprehensive longitudinal evaluation incorporating sociocultural factors (e.g., medical mistrust, healthcare-related discrimination/racism) alongside race/ethnicity as prespecified predictors across multiple KT milestones, including KT type (living [LDKT] and deceased donor KT [DDKT]), has not been performed. MethodsIn this secondary analysis, data came from the KTFT study, a prospective KT candidate cohort. Participants were recruited before KT evaluation start (05/2015-06/2018), coinciding with baseline measure collection, then followed via medical record through 08/2022. We used hierarchically-adjusted Fine-Gray proportional hazards models in this exploratory analysis. ResultsAmong 1108 KT candidates (243 Black, 783 White, 82 Other), medical mistrust was associated with lower cumulative incidence of waitlisting, but no other sociocultural factors were associated with outcomes. Racial and ethnic differences emerged for KT type: Black participants had a greater cumulative incidence of DDKT, and participants categorized as Other race/ethnicity had a lower cumulative incidence of LDKT, relative to White participants. Conclusions Although KTFT reduced racial/ethnic disparities in waitlisting and overall KT receipt, we identified racial/ethnic differences in LDKT and DDKT. Medical mistrust was a significant barrier to waitlisting. Findings suggest that even when the KT evaluation process is streamlined, sociocultural factors and race/ethnicity may influence KT outcomes.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Balancing Equity and HLA Matching in Deceased-Donor Kidney Allocation with Eplet Mismatch 94%
- Direct and indirect impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the survival of kidney transplant recipients: a national observational study in France 94%
- A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of de novo Belatacept-Based Immunosuppression in Lung Transplantation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Selection bias in reporting of median waiting times in organ transplantation 93%
- Cost-effectiveness of transplanting older candidates with acceptable quality deceased donor kidneys 92%
- COVID-19 outcomes, risk factors and associations by race: a comprehensive analysis using electronic health records data in Michigan Medicine 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trends in underlying causes of death in solid organ transplant recipients between 2010 and 2020: Using the CLASS method for determining specific causes of death 94%
- Patient Perceptions by Race of Educational Animations About Living Kidney Donation Made for a Diverse Population 94%
- Return to work outcomes in solid organ transplant recipients: a protocol for a global scoping review 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.