Back

Why Do Some Football Fans Experience More Anxiety? Insights from the 2022 FIFA World Cup

Alarabi, M. A.; Alharbi, N. S.; Aljamaan, F.; Saeed, E.; Dasuqi, S. A.; Altamimi, I.; Alageel, R.; Alsulami, H.; Chaiah, Y.; Jamal, A.; Saad, K.; Bashiri, F. A.; Alhasan, K.; BaHammam, A. S.; Alenazi, S.; Temsah, M. H.

2026-01-19 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.01.16.26344288
Show abstract

BackgroundLarge sporting events, such as the FIFA World Cup, attract global attention and raise questions about psychological impact. Anxiety is among the most common mental health symptoms, but little is known about its predictors during international tournaments. This study explored predictors of anxiety during the FIFA 2022 World Cup. MethodsThis cross-sectional study included 1,331 respondents mostly residing in Saudi Arabia who completed an online survey during the FIFA 2022 World Cup (November-December 2022). The survey included sociodemographic variables, items related to the World Cup viewing habits, perceived effects of the tournament, and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) scale. ResultsAlthough most respondents reported minimal anxiety symptoms (GAD-7 median score = 5, IQR = 6), 41.5% of the sample felt that watching the World Cup made them feel nervous. Females and younger adults reported significantly higher GAD-7 scores (p < 0.001). Employment status and method of watching the matches were not significant predictors. Regression modelling revealed that age, gender, and perceived sleep disruption predicted 9.1% of the variance in GAD-7 scores (p < 0.001). Younger age was the strongest predictor, while perceived sleep disturbance related to watching the matches predicted higher GAD-7 scores. ConclusionsThis was a population-based study of anxiety during the FIFA 2022 World Cup. Younger adults were more likely to report elevated anxiety, and sleep disruption was linked to higher GAD-7 scores. These findings highlight modifiable and non-modifiable predictors of anxiety and may inform public health strategies ahead of FIFA 2026.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 22%
18.0%
2
Journal of Affective Disorders
based on 72 papers
Top 0.4%
16.3%
3
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
based on 116 papers
Top 2%
8.0%
4
Psychiatry Research
based on 33 papers
Top 1%
4.8%
5
Frontiers in Psychiatry
based on 56 papers
Top 2%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 29%
3.0%
7
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 51%
3.0%
8
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
based on 14 papers
Top 0.8%
2.6%
9
BJPsych Open
based on 24 papers
Top 0.7%
2.6%
10
Journal of Psychiatric Research
based on 22 papers
Top 1%
1.7%
11
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
based on 11 papers
Top 0.9%
1.7%
12
Brain and Behavior
based on 19 papers
Top 2%
1.4%
13
Frontiers in Neurology
based on 74 papers
Top 9%
1.4%
14
Public Health
based on 34 papers
Top 3%
1.4%
15
Psychoneuroendocrinology
based on 12 papers
Top 0.4%
1.3%
16
Psychological Medicine
based on 52 papers
Top 6%
1.3%
17
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
based on 10 papers
Top 0.7%
0.9%
18
Cureus
based on 64 papers
Top 16%
0.8%
19
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
based on 10 papers
Top 1%
0.7%
20
PLOS Global Public Health
based on 287 papers
Top 22%
0.7%
21
Public Health in Practice
based on 11 papers
Top 1%
0.7%
22
The British Journal of Psychiatry
based on 21 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
23
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Frontiers in Psychology
based on 18 papers
Top 2%
0.7%