The impact of pet care challenges on medical decision making and healthcare utilization among hospitalized pet owners: a prospective study
Polick, C. S.; Applebaum, J. W.; Errickson, J.; Chervin, R. D.; Iida, M.; Chiang, N.; Johnson, D.; Plant, D.; Braley, T. J.
Show abstract
BackgroundLittle is known about the scope of challenges faced by hospitalized pet owners and their impact on medical decision-making and utilization of health services. ObjectivesTo assess challenges associated with pet care (PC) among hospitalized pet owners and characterize associations between reported challenges, patient characteristics, and adherence to treatment. MethodsPet owners in inpatient or ED settings were surveyed about PC challenges experienced during current and prior hospitalizations, and social support for PC. Electronic medical records were followed prospectively. Bivariate tests and logistic/multiple linear regression models were used to examine associations between survey responses, diagnoses, and healthcare utilization. ResultsAmong 352 respondents (71 ED, 281 inpatient), younger age (p<0.001), less social support (p<0.01), and higher comorbidity (p=0.03) were associated with more PC challenges. Twenty-five ED patients (35%) reported challenges, of whom 46% endorsed likely deferral of hospital admission if recommended (p<0.0001). N=67 inpatients (24%) endorsed PC challenges during their current hospitalization. Prior challenges predicted current challenges (r=0.34, p<0.001). Increased social support reduced the odds of PC challenges (OR:0.80, p<0.01). ConclusionsPet care challenges are common among pet owners, who report substantial impact on medical decision-making and healthcare utilization. Those with reduced social support and prior challenges are particularly vulnerable.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Triaging and Referring In Adjacent General and Emergency Departments (the TRIAGE trial): a cluster randomised controlled trial 91%
- Implementation of Rapid and Frequent SARS-CoV2 Antigen Testing and Response in Congregate Homeless Shelters 91%
- Clinical prediction rule for SARS-CoV-2 infection from 116 U.S. emergency departments 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Patients’ and carers’ experiences of, and engagement with remote home monitoring services for COVID-19 patients: a rapid mixed-methods study 90%
- “I don’t know what to do or where to go”. Experiences of accessing healthcare support from the perspectives of people living with Long Covid and healthcare professionals: A qualitative study in Bradford, UK 90%
- Challenges of visibility and inclusion in Long COVID: a population-based interview study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictors of adverse outcome in patients with suspected COVID-19 managed in a ‘virtual hospital’ setting: a cohort study 93%
- Cohort Profile: A national prospective cohort study of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic outcomes in the U.S. - The CHASING COVID Cohort Study 91%
- The patient experience of COVID-19: A qualitative investigation with symptomatic outpatients 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of atypical intrahospital transfers on patient outcomes: a mixed methods study 92%
- Disparities in outcomes among patients diagnosed with cancer associated with emergency department visits 91%
- An Observational Study of COVID-19 from A Large Healthcare System in Northern New Jersey: Diagnosis, Clinical Characteristics, and Outcomes 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.