Back

The impact of pet care challenges on medical decision making and healthcare utilization among hospitalized pet owners: a prospective study

Polick, C. S.; Applebaum, J. W.; Errickson, J.; Chervin, R. D.; Iida, M.; Chiang, N.; Johnson, D.; Plant, D.; Braley, T. J.

2026-01-18 health systems and quality improvement
10.64898/2026.01.16.26344223 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundLittle is known about the scope of challenges faced by hospitalized pet owners and their impact on medical decision-making and utilization of health services. ObjectivesTo assess challenges associated with pet care (PC) among hospitalized pet owners and characterize associations between reported challenges, patient characteristics, and adherence to treatment. MethodsPet owners in inpatient or ED settings were surveyed about PC challenges experienced during current and prior hospitalizations, and social support for PC. Electronic medical records were followed prospectively. Bivariate tests and logistic/multiple linear regression models were used to examine associations between survey responses, diagnoses, and healthcare utilization. ResultsAmong 352 respondents (71 ED, 281 inpatient), younger age (p<0.001), less social support (p<0.01), and higher comorbidity (p=0.03) were associated with more PC challenges. Twenty-five ED patients (35%) reported challenges, of whom 46% endorsed likely deferral of hospital admission if recommended (p<0.0001). N=67 inpatients (24%) endorsed PC challenges during their current hospitalization. Prior challenges predicted current challenges (r=0.34, p<0.001). Increased social support reduced the odds of PC challenges (OR:0.80, p<0.01). ConclusionsPet care challenges are common among pet owners, who report substantial impact on medical decision-making and healthcare utilization. Those with reduced social support and prior challenges are particularly vulnerable.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.