ThermiQuantTM AquaStream: A Portable Instrument for Quantitative Colorimetric Isothermal Nucleic Acid Amplification Reactions in Paper and Tube Formats
Raut, B.; Palla, G.; Wang, J.; Campbell, S.; Kumar, V.; Ra, K.; Verma, M. S.
Show abstract
Microfluidic paper-based analytical devices ({micro}PADs) are an attractive format for colorimetric nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) because they enable low-cost, portable diagnostics in resource-limited settings. However, researchers often optimize assays in liquid reactions in tubes before translating them to {micro}PADs. Since both formats require separate instruments for incubation and real-time sensing, direct comparison of reactions between the two formats is difficult. To address these cross-platform limitations, we developed ThermiQuant AquaStream, a portable benchtop device (15 x 20 x 16 cm, [~]5 kg; cost: USD 327) that supports seamless colorimetric loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) reactions in both {micro}PADs and tubes under a common workflow. The system enables real-time reaction tracking (every 30 seconds) through onboard image processing, precise isothermal control ({+/-}0.5 {degrees}C) using a repurposed consumer-grade sous-vide heater, and medium-throughput (24 tubes or 42 {micro}PADs). Testing with synthetic SARS-CoV-2 orf7ab DNA fragments demonstrated a limit of detection (LoD) of 50 copies per reaction in both formats (6.7 copies/{micro}L for {micro}PADs; 10 copies/{micro}L for tubes). Standard calibration curves based on quantification time (Tq) and log10 DNA concentration showed strong full range linearity in tubes (from 106 to 50 copies/reaction, R2 = 0.98) and piecewise linearity in {micro}PADs, with quantification reliability only above 1,000 copies/reaction (133 copies/{micro}L, R2 = 0.99), which we set as the limit of quantification, LoQ. By unifying assay optimization across tube and {micro}PAD formats, ThermiQuant AquaStream provides an affordable and versatile benchtop tool for molecular diagnostics for One Health applications in the clinic, on farms, and in the field.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Point-Of-Need One-Pot Multiplexed RT-LAMP Test For Detecting Three Common Respiratory Viruses In Saliva 97%
- Point-of-Care CRISPR-Cas-Assisted SARS-CoV-2 Detection in an Automated and Mobile Droplet Magnetofluidic Device 96%
- Harnessing recombinase polymerase amplification for rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 in resource-limited settings 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Multiplexed Salivary miRNA Quantification for Predicting Severe COVID-19 Symptoms in Children Using Ligation-RPA Amplification Assay 96%
- Detection of YAP1 and AR-V7 mRNA for Prostate Cancer prognosis using an ISFET Lab-On-Chip platform 94%
- Colorimetric CRISPR Biosensor: A Case Study with Salmonella Typhi 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.