Back

Double-Bowtie Filter Design for Pediatric Spectral CT Imaging

Ge, Y.; Sandvold, O. F.; Proksa, R.; Perkins, A. E.; Koehler, T.; Brown, K. M.; Jin, Y.; Daerr, H.; Manjeshwar, R. M.; Noël, P. B.

2026-01-16 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.01.15.26344121 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeTo develop and evaluate a novel double bowtie filter integrating a K-edge material layer with a conventional Teflon filter for pediatric spectral computed tomography (CT). The proposed design aims to enhance spectral signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and spectral separation while maintaining radiation dose levels suitable for pediatric imaging. MethodsA simulation framework was set up and used to model a rapid kVp-switching CT system operating at 70/110 kVp with realistic tube power and geometry constraints. Pediatric phantoms of three sizes (100- 200 mm anterior-posterior width) were used to evaluate performance. Five accessible and safe filter materials-gadolinium (Gd), holmium (Ho), erbium (Er), silver (Ag), and tin (Sn)-were tested in combination with a Teflon bowtie. System performance was quantified using virtual monoenergetic image (VMI) SNR at 40 keV and 70 keV, and the area under the monoenergetic SNR curve (AUMC) as a comprehensive spectral image quality metric. Dose consistency with a traditional Teflon bowtie reference was enforced. ResultsThe Teflon + Gd configuration achieved the highest performance, improving AUMC by 47.5 % on average and up to 56 % for the largest phantom. VMI SNR increased by approximately 49 % at 40 keV and 42 % at 70 keV. ConclusionsThe double-bowtie concept substantially enhances spectral performance. The Teflon + Gd design provides a manufacturable, pediatric-optimized solution adaptable to kVp-switching and other spectral CT architectures, offering improved diagnostic quality at low dose levels.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.