Review and Meta-Analysis of BEST1 Retinopathy: Global Prevalence and Mutational Landscape
Leenders, M.; Gaastra, M.; Tuller, S.; Magrath, G.; Jayagopal, A.; Malone, K. E.
Show abstract
PURPOSEBEST1-associated inherited retinal disease constitutes one of the largest inherited retinal disease patient populations across the world. Innovative therapies are currently in development to address this significant unmet need. To better understand the scale of unmet need, and the distribution of phenotypes and genotypes, we conducted a meta-analysis of BEST1 patients reported in the literature to provide up-to-date patient number estimates. METHODSWe utilized the GeneScape(R) IRD Patient Atlas, an expertly curated database of [~]73K retinal disease patients undergoing extensive genetic testing, in combination with a dedicated literature search to estimate the proportion of IRD patients attributed to BEST1 using fixed effects weighting. This was also translated to patient number estimates for each country. Further extrapolation of patient subtypes was estimated based on cohorts of BEST1 patients reporting phenotypes and genotypes. In addition, a summary of contributing variants is reported by region. RESULTSAcross regions BEST1 retinopathy patients are estimated to occur from 1 in 38K (in Germany) to 1 in 363K in Japan. In the western countries, bi-allelic patients are expected to contribute nearly 20% of the total BEST1 population, whereas one third of patients in East Asia are anticipated to be bi-allelic. CONCLUSIONSWhile patients are reported across the world, their prevalence and composition vary across geographies. In the literature bi-allelic patients are less often reported explicitly as ARB patients in the United States as compared to Europe. Variant diversity is reflected in regional reports and drives phenotypic distribution.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantification of Fundus Autofluorescence Features in a Molecularly Characterized Cohort of More Than 3500 Inherited Retinal Disease Patients from the United Kingdom 95%
- Artificial intelligence to facilitate clinical trial recruitment in age-related macular degeneration 93%
- Corneal neuropathy in central serous chorioretinopathy 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- EyeG2P: an automated variant filtering approach improves efficiency of diagnostic genomic testing for inherited ophthalmic disorders 97%
- Disease-specific variant interpretation highlighted the genetic findings in 2325 Japanese patients with retinitis pigmentosa and allied diseases 94%
- Advancing Genotype-Phenotype Analysis through 3D Facial Morphometry: Insights from Cri-du-Chat Syndrome 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genome-wide analysis of genetic pleiotropy and causal genes across three age-related ocular disorders 91%
- Comprehensive simulation and interpretation of single nucleotide substitutions in GJB2 reveals the genetic and phenotypic landscape of GJB2-related hearing loss 91%
- Novel Loss-of-Function Mutations in COCH Cause Autosomal Recessive Nonsyndromic Deafness 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- North Carolina macular dystrophy: phenotypic variability and computational analysis of disease-implicated non-coding variants 96%
- Statin use in relation to intraocular pressure, glaucoma, and ocular coherence tomography parameters in the UK Biobank 93%
- Rare and Common Genetic Variants, Smoking and Higher Body Mass Index Are Associated with Earlier Age of Progression to Geographic Atrophy and Neovascular Advanced Stages of Macular Degeneration in a Prospective Analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Dicer loss in Muller glia leads to a defined sequence of pathological events beginning with cone dysfunction 93%
- Genetic and cellular basis of impaired phagocytosis and photoreceptor degeneration in CLN3 disease. 91%
- miR-26 deficiency causes alterations in lens transcriptome and results in adult-onset cataract 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.