Back

The genetic architecture of leaf vein density traits and its importance for photosynthesis in maize

Coyac-Rodriguez, J. L.; Perez-Limon, S.; Hernandez-Jaimes, E.; Hernandez-Coronado, M.; Camo-Escobar, D.; Alonso-Nieves, A. L.; Ortega-Estrada, M. d. J.; Gomez-Capetillo, N.; Sawers, R. J.; Ortiz-Ramirez, C. H.

2026-01-15 plant biology
10.64898/2026.01.14.699362 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LILeaf venation density has significantly increased during plant evolution. Higher densities are observed in angiosperms compared to early land plants, and among angiosperms, recently diverged C4 species have the highest values. This has allowed leaves to increase water conductance, transpiration and possibly photosynthesis. Despite its importance, the genetic architecture of this trait is not well characterized and its relationship with photosynthesis has not been clearly established. C_LIO_LIUsing native Mexican varieties of maize adapted to a wide range of environmental conditions, we show that vein density is variable and plastic. We leverage this variation to perform correlation analyses with photosynthetic rates and to map genetic regions associated with vein patterning traits using a MAGIC population. C_LIO_LIOur results show that higher vein densities are correlated with higher photosynthetic rates, but only for small intermediate veins. Varieties adapted to drier environments can substantially increase vein density in response to heat, suggesting a role in water use efficiency. We further detected 12 QTLs associated with vein patterning and identified candidate genes related to small intermediate vein development. C_LIO_LIThese findings have implications for understanding vein architecture evolution, particularly that of C4 plants, which have significantly higher photosynthetic efficiency and productivity under warm and dry conditions. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.