Social Determinants of Health and Preventive Service Utilization in a U.S. Community Health Center: An Application of the Andersen and Aday Model
Torres Del Valle, J.; Sanchez Gonzalez, M. A.; Pena Orellana, M.; Carrion Baralt, J.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo examine how social determinants of health (SDOH) influence the utilization of preventive health services at a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) in Erie, Pennsylvania, using the Andersen and Aday behavioral model (Andersen, 1995; Aday & Andersen, 1974). MethodsA cross-sectional, descriptive correlational study was conducted among adults ([≥]18 years) receiving primary care at Community Health Net from March through October 2018. The data was collected via a self-administered questionnaire, classifying variables as predisposing, enabling, or need factors, per the Andersen and Aday model. The Protocol for Responding to & Assessing Patients Assets, Risks & Experiences (PRAPARE) tool was used to assess SDOH. Mental health status was measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale. Logistic regression identified predictors of preventive service utilization. ResultsOf the 274 participants, 65.8% were over 50 years old, 50.2% had low annual incomes ([≤]$15,000), 71.0% had public insurance, 58.8% were unemployed, and 10.0% were homeless. A total of 78.8% of the participants reported experiencing emotional or physical problems that affected their social life; 16.1% reported having transportation barriers and 13.9% reported a lack of social support. Preventive service utilization was high (75.1%). Multivariable analysis showed that low incomes ([≤]$15,000) (odds ratio [OR] = 1.82, 95% CI [1.15, 2.89]), unemployment (OR = 2.10, 95% CI [1.30, 3.40]), and mental health conditions (OR = 3.05, 95% CI [1.80, 5.18]) were significant predictors of utilization. Homelessness showed a positive but not statistically significant association (OR = 1.68, 95% CI [0.92, 3.06). The most frequently reported unmet needs among participants were mental health care (24.8%), transportation (16.1%), and social support (13.9%). ConclusionsSocioeconomic disadvantage and mental health needs are strongly associated with preventive service utilization in this FQHC population, consistent with the Andersen and Aday model and international evidence (Braveman & Gottlieb, 2014; Marmot et al., 2008; Magnan, 2021). Addressing SDOH--including poverty, unemployment, mental health, and access barriers-- remains essential for advancing health equity in high-risk communities (World Health Organization, 2008; Artiga & Hinton, 2022).
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Sociodemographic and Mental Health Predictors of Mental Health Service Use Across Provider Types 94%
- Loneliness among people with severe mental ill health during the COVID-19 pandemic: results from a linked UK population cohort study 94%
- A mixed methods analysis of youth mental health intervention feasibility and acceptability in a North American city: perspectives from Seattle, Washington 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Health Needs Assessment: Development of a Simplified Risk Probability Scale (SRPS) Design for Rapid Mental Health Screening in Emergency Frontline Rescue Teams 92%
- Transnational adoptees in healthcare: barriers, resources, and needs 92%
- Understanding care-seeking of pregnant women from underserved groups: A systematic review and meta-ethnography 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mental health services implementation in Colombia – a systematic review 93%
- Listening to older voices: Results of a cross-sectional survey of older patient-reported experiences of facility-based healthcare in Nouna, Burkina Faso 93%
- Awareness, utility and preferences of campus-based mental health services at tertiary institutions in Harare Zimbabwe: a cross-sectional study. 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- "What matters in help-seeking and disclosure intent of intimate partner violence during the COVID-19 pandemic:Similarities and differences across demographic groups" 92%
- A Cohort Study: Evaluating Self-Efficacy in Adolescents Attending a Tailored Youth-Informed Breastfeeding Program 91%
- Impostor Phenomenon in the Nutrition and Dietetics Profession: An Online Cross-Sectional Survey 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mental health self-care during the COVID-19 pandemic: A prospective cohort study in Australia 94%
- Comparative analysis of policies and programs to support families and children during COVID-19 92%
- Capability impacts of the Covid-19 lockdown in association with mental well-being, social connections and existing vulnerabilities: an Austrian survey study 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.