Back

Low-level mosaic variants causing the pancreatic disease congenital hyperinsulinism can be detected from blood DNA

Bennett, J. J.; Laver, T. W.; Mannisto, J. M. E.; Houghton, J. A. L.; De Franco, E.; Kalyon, O.; Wright, S.; Johnson, A.-M.; De Leon, D. D.; Globa, E.; Kummer, S.; Banerjee, I.; Dastamani, A.; International Congenital Hyperinsulinism Consortium, ; Wakeling, M. N.; Johnson, M. B.; Flanagan, S. E.

2026-01-15 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.01.13.26344002 medRxiv
Show abstract

A substantial proportion of individuals with a well-defined monogenic disorder remain without a genetic diagnosis. Low-level mosaic pathogenic variants are increasingly recognised as an underappreciated cause of monogenic disease but are technically challenging to detect, particularly in organ-specific conditions when affected tissue is inaccessible. We systematically investigated low-level mosaic variants in individuals with congenital hyperinsulinism (CHI: n=1,252) or neonatal diabetes (NDM: n=312), two opposing pancreatic disorders of insulin secretion. We screened for established pathogenic variants with variant allele fraction (VAF) <8% in dominant CHI (ABCC8, GCK, GLUD1, HK1) or dominant NDM (ABCC8, KCNJ11, INS) genes in targeted next generation sequencing (tNGS) data using Mutect2. This called 40 variants across the four genes in 39 individuals with CHI. No candidate variants were found in the NDM cohort. Orthogonal validation of 35 variants using TaqMan-based droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) confirmed 26/35 variants. The median VAF for confirmed variants was 3.6% (1.1-7.8%), while false positives (9/35) predominantly had a VAF <1% with some overlap in VAF with true positives. This study shows that disease-causing low-level mosaic variants in dominant CHI genes can be detected in blood using tNGS but require orthogonal validation. These results provide a framework to improve diagnostic yield in organ-specific conditions where mosaic variants may represent an important missed cause of disease.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.7%
2
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.2%
3
Diabetes
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
4
Diabetologia
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.9%
5
Human Mutation
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
npj Genomic Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
8
Genetics in Medicine Open
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
10
Diabetes Care
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
11
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.7%
14
Human Genetics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
15
Molecular Metabolism
105 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
16
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
17
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
19
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.8%
20
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
22
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
24
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
26
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
27
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
28
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.5%
29
Human Genomics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
30
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%