How do autistic adults and their families experience, understand, and manage gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms in daily life? A qualitative manuscript from the GI Wanna Talk About Autism Study
Almendinger, K.; Holingue, C.; Faucett, M.; DiJulia, F.; Daley, K.; Williams, Z.; Brasher, S.; Gallo, J. J.; Pellicano, E.
Show abstract
BackgroundGastrointestinal (GI) symptoms are prevalent, persistent, and frequently disabling among autistic individuals. Existing research has focused predominantly on children, with comparatively little attention to GI experiences in adulthood. Qualitative studies in pediatric populations document substantial unmet GI-related healthcare needs, including negative healthcare encounters and limited access to autism-informed services. MethodsUsing a community-based participatory research (CBPR) framework, we conducted qualitative interviews with 26 participants (21 autistic adults, 5 parents reporting on behalf of an adult autistic child), of varying race, sexual orientation, genders, socioeconomic and educational statuses, and ages. Interviews were conducted on Zoom, ranging from 22-110 minutes long, exploring the physical, emotional, and functional impacts of GI symptoms; how these experiences relate to autism; barriers to treatment; and participants needs and priorities for improving GI health care (priorities reported elsewhere). We conducted a reflexive thematic analysis following Braun and Clarke, using an interpretivist-constructivist epistemological stance. Coding and theme development were inductive and data-driven. Themes were refined collaboratively through repeated engagement with the data, analytic memoing, and discussion of areas of interpretive uncertainty until shared meaning and coherent thematic structure were achieved. Once the codebook and thematic structure were finalized, all transcripts were systematically coded for analysis. ResultsParticipants described gastrointestinal symptoms as chronic, unpredictable, and highly consequential, shaping physical functioning, emotional wellbeing, daily routines, autonomy, and social participation. Symptoms were understood as arising from interacting biological, sensory, emotional, and contextual factors, with triggers often difficult to identify or anticipate. Experiences with healthcare were frequently characterized by dismissal, communication barriers, system complexity, and prior trauma, contributing to delayed or avoided care and heightened distress. In response, autistic adults and caregivers relied on individualized, trial-and-error management strategies - including avoidance of triggers, routine and environmental planning, dietary and pharmacologic approaches, and sensory or emotional regulation - alongside social support and peer communities to cope with persistent uncertainty and limited clinical guidance. ConclusionGI symptoms in autistic adults frequently have dramatic negative impacts on everyday life, reducing both quality of life and restricting the ability to fully engage in society and desired activities. Despite the clear magnitude of impact, knowledge and support are lacking and management remains difficult, confusing, and often unsuccessful. Improving care will require multi-layered, neurodiversity-informed approaches that recognize autistic adults as central knowledge-holders and active partners in research and clinical decision-making.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The lived experience of rejection sensitivity in ADHD - a qualitative exploration 93%
- Lived experiences of caregivers of persons with epilepsy attending an epilepsy clinic at a tertiary hospital, eastern Uganda: A phenomenological approach 92%
- Exploring the experiences of loneliness in adults with mental health problems: a co-produced participatory qualitative interview study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Challenges of visibility and inclusion in Long COVID: a population-based interview study 93%
- “I don’t know what to do or where to go”. Experiences of accessing healthcare support from the perspectives of people living with Long Covid and healthcare professionals: A qualitative study in Bradford, UK 91%
- Understanding Covid-19 misinformation and vaccine hesitancy in context: Findings from a qualitative study involving citizens in Bradford, UK 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of COVID-19 restrictions on pre-school children’s eating, activity and sleep behaviours: a qualitative study 94%
- The patient experience of COVID-19: A qualitative investigation with symptomatic outpatients 93%
- Common Factors in Serious Case Reviews of Child Maltreatment where there is a Medical Cause of Death: Qualitative Thematic Analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health and well-being of people living with a long-term physical health condition: a qualitative study 93%
- Feasibility and acceptability of daily testing at school as an alternative to self-isolation following close contact with a confirmed case of COVID-19: A qualitative analysis 92%
- A mixed methods study evaluating food insecurity and diet quality in households accessing food aid in England 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring Patient and Staff Experiences of Video Consultations During COVID-19 in an English Outpatient Care Setting: Secondary Data Analysis of Routinely Collected Feedback Data 90%
- Development of the NeuroFlow Severity Score and Comparison With Validated Measures for Depression and Anxiety 88%
- The Validity of the Parsley Symptom Index: an e-PROM designed for Telehealth 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.