Back

An Ex Vivo Muscle Physiology Method for Robust Measurement of Supraspinatus Muscle Function in Mouse Models

Mazonson, B. R.; Kalco, H.; Divieti Pajevic, P.; Thompson, L. V.; Connizzo, B.

2026-01-13 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.01.12.698992 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The supraspinatus is the most frequently injured rotator cuff muscle, but its anatomical characteristics such as larger size, complex fiber architecture, and a single exposed tendon have limited the development of reproducible ex vivo contractility assays. In this study, we establish a robust method for ex vivo assessment of murine supraspinatus contractile function and characterize its physiological properties across age and injury conditions. We additionally adapt a barium chloride (BaCl2)-induced injury protocol for the supraspinatus, an approach not previously described, to evaluate how acute myofiber degeneration affects muscle performance. Male C57BL/6 mice (4 months) underwent 1.2% BaCl2 injection directly into the supraspinatus to induce controlled myofiber necrosis, allowing comparison of contractile behavior between injured and uninjured muscles. Using our injury ex vivo physiological testing protocol, we quantified optimal length (L0), twitch kinetics, force-frequency responses, peak tetanic force, and preliminary fatigue-recovery dynamics. Our protocol consistently generated fused tetanic contractions and reproducible force-frequency curves in the supraspinatus. We observed differences in supraspinatus contractility between young and old mice, consistent with well-established age-related changes in hindlimb muscle contractility. In addition, BaCl2 injury produced significant impairments in contractility 48 hours post-injection, demonstrating the sensitivity of this method to acute muscle damage. This study provides a novel and reliable method for evaluating the contractile function of the murine supraspinatus muscle ex vivo, overcoming previous anatomical challenges.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Applied Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.7%
2
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.5%
50% of probability mass above
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.7%
4
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.8%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 28%
3.6%
6
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.2%
7
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
8
Journal of Biomechanics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
9
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
10
The FASEB Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
11
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
12
Journal of Neurotrauma
31 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
13
Muscle & Nerve
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
14
Journal of Experimental Biology
259 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
15
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
16
Experimental Physiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
17
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 43%
0.6%
18
Physiological Reports
40 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
19
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
20
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
21
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
22
Journal of Visualized Experiments
34 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
23
European Journal of Applied Physiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
24
JCI Insight
277 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
25
npj Microgravity
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.5%