Back

Male-biased triploidy in Populus tremuloides and genomic structure of its southern relict populations

Goessen, R.; DING, C.; Raley, E.; Tischenko, L.; Nunneley, J.; Fladung, M.; Wehenkel, C.; Isabel, N.; Porth, I.

2026-01-12 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.01.12.695788 bioRxiv
Show abstract

PremiseIsolated populations at the southern range edge of aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) offer a unique opportunity to study ploidy, clonality and distribution of sex under arid, high-elevation conditions. We aimed to characterize such traits, including potential sex biases and associations with ploidy, investigating previously unexamined Texan populations in a range-wide genomic framework of genetic structure and demographic history of this keystone species. MethodsWe combined new genotypic data from western Texas (Davis Mountains, Big Bend, Guadalupe Mountains) with preexisting datasets, assessing range-wide genetic diversity, clonality, ploidy, and sex. We further conducted ADMIXTURE and phylogenetic analyses, reconstructed historical effective population sizes (Ne) with Stairway Plot 2. ResultsTexan stands revealed high clonality, with diploid and triploid genets. Most Davis and Guadalupe Mountain individuals clustered with a southwestern U.S. lineage of aspen, whereas Big Bend individuals grouped with a Mexican, demonstrating for the first time the continuous northward geographic distributions of allele frequencies in aspen coherent with phylogenetics. The significant male bias in sex ratios, particularly among triploids, suggests dimorphism in survival or reproduction. No effect of elevation on sex was identified. Demographic inference indicated an ancient bottleneck ([~]1-2 Mya) common to all six lineages, but more recent historical Ne trajectories differ between the northern and southern regions. ConclusionsThese findings shed light on how clonality, ploidy, and sex have interacted in shaping dioecious plant species, highlighting the importance of incorporating such information into projections of how climate change and habitat loss will affect their distribution, abundance, and the extinction risk of their marginal populations.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
American Journal of Botany
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
25.8%
2
Annals of Botany
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.3%
3
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
9.1%
4
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
5
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.8%
6
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
7
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
8
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.3%
9
Applications in Plant Sciences
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
10
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.7%
12
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 35%
1.5%
14
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
15
Forest Ecology and Management
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
16
Journal of Systematics and Evolution
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
17
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
18
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
20
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
21
Journal of Biogeography
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
22
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
24
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%