Understanding the Experiences and Needs of Participants in Decentralised Clinical Trials: A Qualitative Analysis
Gamble, E.; Heavin, C.; Linehan, C.
Show abstract
BackgroundExperts across industry, academia, and regulatory bodies increasingly stress the importance of prioritising participant experiences in clinical trials. Simultaneously, the shift towards decentralised approaches is reshaping how trials are designed and conducted, with a direct impact on the experiences of the participants involved. ObjectiveThis study aims to gain a deeper understanding of the experiences of participants taking part in Decentralised Clinical Trials, focusing on the unique challenges and opportunities presented by remote trial participation, and the tools and organisational processes that support participation. MethodsThis exploratory qualitative study involved interviews with fourteen individuals who had personal experience participating in remote or decentralised clinical trials. The interview transcripts were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis to identify key patterns and insights. ResultsWe generated six main themes: (1) Positive experiences with remote participation, (2) co-ownership and meaningful engagement, (3) increasingly fragmented care and support, (4) confusion and uncertainty in navigating the trial, (5) need for human interaction and connection, (6) the hidden workload - navigating the burdens of remote trial participation. While the remote trial is an adaptable and sustainable model offering several benefits for participants and potential for clinical trials, it introduces complexities and challenges for participants that can negatively impact engagement and experience. ConclusionThis study recognises both the potential benefits and challenges introduced by remote trial participation. It underscores the need for technology that not only streamlines trial processes but also responds to the needs, experiences, and well-being of participants. This requires rethinking trial technology features and functionality, strengthening collaboration with stakeholders, and focusing on elements of the participant experience that go beyond remote access and rudimentary data collection.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Facilitated transition in HIV drug trial closure: a conceptual model for HIV post-trial care 95%
- “It reminds me and motivates me” : Human-centered design and implementation of an interactive, SMS-based digital intervention to improve early retention on antiretroviral therapy: usability and acceptability among new initiates in a high-volume, public clinic in Malawi 95%
- Evaluating user experience with immersive technology in simulation-based education: a modified Delphi study with qualitative analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and evaluation of rapid data-enabled access to routine clinical information to enhance early recruitment to the national clinical platform trial of COVID-19 community treatments 93%
- Operational Strategies among Infectious Disease Clinical Trial Sites During Pandemics: A Scoping Review 91%
- Development of a consensus extension of the estimands framework for cluster randomised trials (CRT-estimands): results from an international Delphi study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 94%
- The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review 94%
- Exploring perspectives on digital smoking cessation just-in-time adaptive interventions: A focus group study with adult smokers and smoking cessation professionals 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- How can rural community-engaged health services planning affect sustainable health care system changes? - A process description and qualitative analysis of data from the Rural Coordination Centre of British Columbia’s Rural Site Visits Project 93%
- Ethnicity and COVID-19 outcomes among healthcare workers in the United Kingdom: UK-REACH ethico-legal research, qualitative research on healthcare workers’ experiences, and stakeholder engagement protocol 93%
- Evaluating a first fully automated interview grounded in Multiple Mini Interview (MMI) methodology: results from a feasibility study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Consent to Recontact for Future Research Using Linked Primary Healthcare Data: Outcomes and General Practice Perceptions from the ATHENA COVID-19 Study 92%
- Effects of Health Technology Use and Digital Health Engagement on Clinical Trial Participation: Findings from the Health Information National Trends Survey 91%
- Use of estimands in cluster randomised trials: a review 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.