ACEIs versus ARBs in HIV Patients

BackgroundAngiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are established antihypertensive treatments that reduce cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. However, their comparative effectiveness in people with HIV (PWH) is not well examined. This study evaluated the comparative effectiveness of ACEIs and ARBs head-to-head and versus no antihypertensive treatment in preventing primary CVD. MethodsUsing a target trial emulation framework and data from the North American AIDS Cohort Collaboration on Research and Design (NA-ACCORD), we estimated observational analogs of intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) effects of antihypertensive treatments in preventing primary CVD (myocardial infarction, non-MI coronary artery disease, stroke, transient ischemic attack, peripheral vascular disease, cardiovascular death) among hypertensive PWH, with subgroup analyses for Black and White PWH. ResultsCompared with no antihypertensive treatment, ACEIs and ARBs were both associated with lower CVD risk in PWH, with similar effect sizes in ITT and PP analyses (ACEI ITT adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 0.79, 95% CI [0.70-0.89]; ACEI PP: 0.71 [0.55-0.90]; ARB ITT: 0.87 [0.65-1.16]; ARB PP: 0.37 [0.18-0.76]). Race-stratified ITT and PP analyses suggested somewhat greater risk reductions in White than Black PWH, although differences were not statistically significant. In head-to-head comparisons, ACEIs and ARBs showed comparable effectiveness overall (ITT: 1.14 [0.84-1.55]; PP: 0.54 [0.25-1.18]), and within race strata. ConclusionsOur study found that both ACEIs and ARBs were effective in reducing CVD risk among PWH, with similar effectiveness observed for both medications. The analysis did not reveal statistically significant differences in effectiveness between Black and White PWH for either drug.