Back

Prognostic impact of left ventricular assist device-related complications under the new heart transplant allocation system

Lee, T.; Moss, N.; Toyoda, N.; Egorova, N. N.; Serrao, G. W.; Pahuja, M.; Nomoto, K.; Anyanwu, A. C.; Itagaki, S.

2026-01-22 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.01.10.26343868 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundIn 2018, the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) revised the donor heart allocation policy, replacing the single urgency status for left ventricular assist device (LVAD)-related complications with three distinct categories. We evaluated the impact of this policy modification on transplant access and outcomes. MethodsThe UNOS Standard Transplant Analysis and Research File was queried to identify adult patients listed for heart transplantation with a LVAD-related complication in the United States between 2018 and 2023. The cumulative incidence of heart transplantation, mortality on device, and overall mortality following complication were assessed. ResultsDuring the study period, 792 patients experienced an LVAD complication that led to an initial listing or change in urgency status. Device infection was the most frequent complication (n=472, 59.6%), followed by device malfunction (n=80, 10.1%), aortic regurgitation (n=73, 9.2%), ventricular arrhythmias (n=46, 5.8%), thrombosis/hemolysis (n=43, 5.4%), bleeding (n=42, 5.3%), and right heart failure (n=36, 4.5%). At 1 year, transplantation incidence was 71.5% (95% CI, 67.9-74.8%), mortality on device was 3.8% (95% CI, 2.5-5.4%), and overall mortality was 12.3% (95% CI, 9.9-15.1%). Right heart failure was associated with increased 1-year mortality (34.1%, 95% CI, 18.2-50.8%; adjusted HR 2.0, 95% CI, 1.1-3.8). ConclusionsThe revised allocation system provides LVAD patients with complications timely access to transplantation, reflected in high transplant rates and low mortality. Right heart failure remains a distinct subgroup, with one-third of patients not surviving to one year, suggesting this complication may warrant consideration for higher urgency status.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
18.3%
2
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.9%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.2%
4
International Journal of Cardiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
5
Circulation
74 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Circulation: Heart Failure
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
7
Heart
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
8
The American Journal of Cardiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
9
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
10
European Heart Journal
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
11
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
12
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
13
Heart Rhythm
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
14
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
16
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.3%
17
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.3%
18
Transplantation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
19
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
20
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 70%
1.0%
21
Open Heart
21 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
22
Transfusion
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%