Back

Automating the Clinical Interpretation of LDLR, APOB, and PCSK9 Variants: A Web-Based Platform for FH Diagnosis

Gellert-Kristensen, H.; Eyrich, T. M.; Stender, S.

2026-01-13 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.01.10.26343831 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundClinical interpretation of LDLR, APOB, and PCSK9 variants is essential for diagnosing familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), yet manual evidence curation is labor-intensive and prone to variability. MethodsWe developed a web-based platform (https://fh-interpret.shinyapps.io/beta/) to automate the synthesis of multi-dimensional evidence. The tool integrates population frequencies (gnomAD), phenotype associations (UK Biobank), AI-based pathogenicity scores (AlphaMissense), high-throughput functional data from saturation mutagenesis, and established clinical classifications (ClinVar, HGMD). ResultsThe application streamlines the diagnostic workflow by automatically synthesizing: (1) population frequencies from gnomAD to assess variant rarity; (2) statin-adjusted LDL-cholesterol association analyses in [~]470,000 UK Biobank participants; (3) AlphaMissense pathogenicity predictions; (4) functional scores for [~]17,000 LDLR variants quantifying impact on LDL uptake and LDLR cell-surface abundance; (5) existing clinical evidence from ClinVar and HGMD; and (6) identification of pathogenic variants at identical amino acid positions (ACMG PM5). The tool generates narrative evidence summaries to facilitate standardized ACMG/AMP classification. ConclusionsBy providing real-time access to massive-scale genomic, phenotypic, and functional datasets within a single platform, this tool streamlines the FH diagnostic workflow and supports more consistent and efficient clinical variant interpretation. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=126 SRC="FIGDIR/small/26343831v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (42K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@a7d316org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1370aborg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@49f9faorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@ba936a_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.