Back

A continuous viral vaccine biomanufacturing platform utilizing multiple bioreactor configurations

Sargunas, J.; Preim, B.; Carman, D.; Sarvari, T.; Nold, N. M.; Sharma, V.; Pekosz, A.; Heldt, C. L.; Betenbaugh, M.

2026-01-11 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.01.09.698222 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Scalable, continuous biomanufacturing processes have grown in importance to meet demand for smaller bioreactor sizes, lowered production costs, and improved quality attributes. The Sf9/recombinant baculovirus (rBV) expression system demonstrates promise for virus-like particle (VLP) vaccine and gene therapy production. Here, we present a continuous rBV platform integrating an infection plug flow reactor (PFR) between stirred tank growth (gCSTR) and production (pCSTR) bioreactors. Cell expansion in the gCSTR included a ramp-up stage followed by continuous growth, reaching a steady state of 5x106 cells/mL and >90% viability. Peclet number-fit tracer studies confirmed near-ideal plug flow in the PFR, yielding a 10 h residence time and progressive infection as measured by gp64 signaling. Finally, a pCSTR with a residence time of 48 h exhibited sustained recombinant protein production. An integrated pilot cascade incorporating all reactors ran continuously for 5 days, maintaining stable CSTR cell densities and a measurable increase in infected cell diameter from 14.5 m to 16.1 m. Western blotting and EM of [~]100 nm VLPs in pCSTR effluent demonstrated platform success. Digital twin mechanistic models across four distinct stages of bioreactor operation and Hill-type relationships for rBV infection kinetics predicted cell growth and death for a 7-day run, demonstrating promise for designing continuous systems in silico and building a quantitative framework for scale-up and optimization. Our multi-stage reactor configuration represents a cell host- and product-agnostic production scheme, particularly for processes prone to product heterogeneity, and paves the way towards a true end-to-end continuous platform for myriad modalities in the future.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.5%
2
Metabolic Engineering
68 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
3
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.8%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.8%
5
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
6
Chemical Engineering Journal
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
7
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
9
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.9%
10
Advanced Materials Technologies
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
11
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
12
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
13
Bioactive Materials
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
16
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
17
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.5%
18
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.5%
19
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
20
npj Microgravity
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
21
Cytotherapy
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
Biochemistry
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Advanced Materials
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%
27
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
Small
70 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%