Quality improvement in emergency units in low resource settings: A qualitative assessment for understanding challenges and delivering solutions
Welgama, I. P.; Lange Da Silva, D.; O'Reilly, G.; Nishimwe, A.; Ignatowicz, A.; Davies, J.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo meet the World Health Organization (WHO) requirement of strengthening integrated Emergency, Critical and Operative (ECO) care, it is necessary to develop ECO-related guidance and tools for Quality Improvement (QI) in Emergency Units (EUs). This study aimed to identify the barriers and facilitators for QI in EUs in Low- or Middle-Income- countries (LMICs) and explore potential measures for assessing quality of care, to inform guidance and tool development across all quality domains. MethodsWe conducted in-depth interviews (IDIs) with 11 specialist emergency physicians from LMICs and organized a workshop with global technical experts in emergency care. Transcribed interviews were thematically analysed, integrating WHO quality domains and the WHO Health Systems Framework. The workshop included presentations, discussions, and interactive ranking exercises to evaluate QI measurement methods and identify priority WHO quality domains. Related outcomes were synthesized to generate insights for the development of QI guidance and tools. FindingsQI efforts in LMICs primarily focused on effectiveness, timeliness, safety, and occasionally patient centeredness. Key barriers to QI specific to LMIC EUs included high patient turnover, a lack of skilled staff, limited funds and resources, and prioritizing patient care quantity over quality. Facilitators included the availability of QI guidance, training, initiating small-scale projects, enhancing documentation and communication, and supportive hospital management. Safety and effectiveness were considered the most feasible QI domains for improvement, though all were recognized as important. Inconsistencies in how participants defined the domains highlighted the need to develop clear guidance on definitions, and importance of all domains and measures appropriate to each. ConclusionsEmergency unit is a unique environment handling time-critical health conditions and therefore requires the development of specific tools and guidance for delivery of QI. Addressing barriers and leveraging facilitators identified in this study can inform the development of effective QI strategies for LMIC EUs.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving the quality of in-patient neonatal routine data as a pre-requisite for monitoring and improving quality of care at scale: A multi-site retrospective cohort study in Kenyan hospitals 93%
- Exploring variations in the implementation of a health system level policy intervention to improve maternal and child health outcomes in resource limited settings: A qualitative multiple case study from Uganda 93%
- Examining National Health Insurance Fund Members’ preferences and trade-offs for the attributes of contracted outpatient facilities in Kenya: a discrete choice experiment 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Systematic Review: The Dimensions and Indicators utilized in the Performance Evaluation of Health Care Organizations- An Implication during COVID-19 Pandemic 93%
- The Monash Learning Health System Maturity Matrix: Codesign of a Tool to Measure and Guide Improvement in Complex Health System Behaviour 92%
- Revisiting the use and effectiveness of patient-held records in rural Malawi 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementation Science Protocol for a participatory, theory-informed implementation research programme in the context of health system strengthening in sub-Saharan Africa (ASSET-ImplementER) 95%
- The use of the positive deviance approach for healthcare system service improvement: A scoping review protocol 93%
- Mortality Outcomes in Task-Sharing for Emergency Care: Impact of Emergency Physician Supervision on Non-Physician Emergency Care in Rural Uganda 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health service utilisation in Sierra Leone 94%
- Essential Emergency and Critical Care – a consensus among global clinical experts 93%
- Progress in Epidemic Ready Primary Health Care: Early Pilot Results from Four African Countries (Ethiopia, Nigeria, Sierra Leone and Uganda), December 2023 – October 2024 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The experience of European hospital-based health care workers on following infection prevention and control procedures for COVID-19 93%
- Process of Use of Evidence Products by Frontline Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Staff at the Facility Level in Ghana. 92%
- Getting to the Emergency Department in Time: Interviews With Patients and Their Caregivers on the Challenges to Emergency Care Utilization in Rural Uganda - a Grounded Theory Approach 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.