Is 7p14.1 an orofacial cleft risk locus? Genome-wide study of copy number variation in multiple populations provides both a replication of previous studies and an alternative explanation
Mukhopadhyay, N.; Feingold, E. E.; Brand, H.; Lee, M. K.; Kurtas, E. N.; Sanchis-Juan, A.; Moreno-Uribe, L.; Wehby, G.; Valencia-Ramirez, L. C.; Restrepo Muneton, C. P.; Padilla, C.; Deleyiannis, F.; Poletta, F. A.; Orioli, I. M.; Hecht, J. T.; Buxo, C. J.; Butali, A.; Adeyemo, W. L.; Abebe, M. E.; Vieira, A. R.; Shaffer, J. R.; Murray, J. C.; Weinberg, S. M.; Ruczinski, I.; Leslie-Clarkson, E. J.; Marazita, M. L.
Show abstract
ObjectiveOur understanding of the genetic causes of non-syndromic orofacial clefts (OFCs) is based largely upon genetic studies of common and rare nucleotide variants. Less is known about the role of copy number variations (CNVs) and the studies published to date have been limited to either small samples or targeted genomic regions. The objective of our study is to investigate the contribution of CNVs spread across the entire genome to OFC risk in a large multi-ancestry cohort. MethodsWe utilized PennCNV on microarray genotyping data to detect CNVs in 10,240 participants (2,484 with clefts, 7,756 unaffected). 70,695 quality-filtered autosomal CNVs (49,660 deletions, 21,035 duplications) were used to assign normal/abnormal copy number statuses at 67,199 positions from the GRCh37 genome assembly. Genome-wide association was run between cleft status and copy number status. ResultsWe observed a highly significant association between OFCs and deletions on chromosome 7p14.1 (p=1.32e-35) driven by Central and South American ancestry (p=1.04e-25) participants, with less significant contributions from European (p=3.37e-08) and Asian (p=0.01) ancestry participants. We also observed four other loci with p-values below 10e-04. ConclusionThe 7p14.1 association observed in our study is a replication of two prior studies in independent cohorts of European ancestry. However, this locus lies in a T-cell receptor region that is subject to somatic rearrangements that decrease in frequency with age and may affect genetic association results. Our data show age effects as well as differences between blood and saliva samples. Thus, our results can be interpreted either as supporting a previously established association with orofacial clefts, or as questioning those previous results in favor of a hypothesis about the behavior of somatic rearrangements in T-cell receptor regions.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.