Back

RSV and all-cause lower respiratory infection burden among infants in remote British Columbia: Retrospective population-based birth cohort study

Watts, A.; Vineta Paramo, M.; Jamieson-Datzkiw, T.; Bone, J. N.; Lavoie, L.; Arbour, L.; Solimano, A.; Sadarangani, M. M.; Sbihi, H.; Goldfarb, D. M.; Lavoie, P. M.

2026-01-11 pediatrics
10.64898/2026.01.09.26343745 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundIn 2024, the National Advisory Committee on Immunization recommended universal RSV immunization across Canada, prioritizing infants in remote communities. However, in the absence of population-based data, programs may not effectively narrow health gaps in remote communities. MethodsRetrospective cohort study of all births in British Columbia (BC) from April 2013 to March 2024, followed for 1 year, using health administrative data. Main outcomes were hospitalizations for all-cause and RSV-lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI). Secondary outcomes were tertiary Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) admissions, length of stay, and air transport. Main exposures were community remoteness and social determinants of health. Incidence rates and incidence rate ratios (IRR) adjusted for sex, prematurity, and chronic conditions were estimated using Poisson generalized estimating equations. ResultsAmong 472,623 infants, those living in remote communities (N=3636) had higher hospitalization risk for all-cause (IRR: 2.91, 95%CI 2.02-3.65) and RSV-LRTIs (IRR: 1.60, 95%CI 1.17-2.19) compared to metropolitan areas. Length of stay and PICU admission rates were similar by region. Almost half (48.8%) of children from remote areas hospitalized for all-cause LRTIs required air evacuation. Infants from remote communities remained at higher risk for all-cause (aIRR 2.84, 95% CI 2.22-3.63) and RSV-LRTI (aIRR 1.56, 95% CI 1.15-2.12) hospitalizations after adjusting for covariates. InterpretationInfants in remote communities experienced a disproportionately high RSV-LRTI burden, supporting prioritized RSV interventions in these regions. The residual risk after accounting for known factors highlights the need to investigate additional drivers of vulnerability in remote areas.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.8%
2
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.9%
3
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.7%
4
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.1%
5
Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
6
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
8
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.1%
9
Archives of Disease in Childhood
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
10
Pediatric Research
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
11
Pediatrics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
12
Annals of Epidemiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
13
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.4%
15
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.4%
17
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
18
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
19
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
20
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.6%
25
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 79%
0.6%