Back

Bridging Genomics and Pharmacoepidemiology to Expand Treatment Options for Alcohol Use Disorder

Rentsch, C. T.; Malone, S. G.; Shi, M.; Setzer, M. R.; Piserchia, Z.; Winterlind, E. L.; Farokhnia, M.; Tazare, J.; Justice, A. C.; Fiellin, D. A.; Leggio, L.; Kranzler, H. R.; Gray, J. C.

2026-01-11 addiction medicine
10.64898/2026.01.09.26343615 medRxiv
Show abstract

Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is a chronic, relapsing condition and a major public health problem. However, few medications are approved to treat AUD, and those available show limited efficacy. Drug repurposing is a cost-effective strategy to identify novel therapeutic uses for existing medications. Here, we describe a pipeline that integrates genetic and electronic health record (EHR) data to identify and evaluate drugs to be repurposed for treating AUD. Our approach comprises 1) alcohol-associated gene identification and biological network generation; 2) mapping drugs to target proteins; 3) filtering promising repurposing candidates; and 4) an exemplar pharmacoepidemiologic analysis of the effect of an identified drug (i.e., baclofen) on alcohol consumption. Linking loci to genes from a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of problematic alcohol use identified 94 genes, which we expanded to 327 alcohol-related genes through network-based analyses. Across these analyses, 52 genes were linked to 195 FDA-approved drugs, including four already approved or used off-label to treat AUD. After filtering for safety, relevance, and data availability, 26 candidate drugs, including baclofen, were selected for further evaluation. An evaluation of the real-world effectiveness of baclofen using national EHR data from the United States Department of Veterans Affairs provided evidence that baclofen-exposed patients reduced alcohol consumption more than propensity-score-matched unexposed patients. This approach, which aligns genomic findings with real-world clinical data, provides an efficient method for identifying promising drug repurposing candidates and prioritizing those that merit evaluation in randomized trials to ultimately advance pharmacotherapies for AUD.

Published in Alcohol, Clinical and Experimental Research (predicted rank #5) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Translational Psychiatry
260 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.0%
2
Addiction Neuroscience
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.7%
3
Addiction
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.0%
4
American Journal of Psychiatry
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.9%
Alcohol, Clinical and Experimental Research · published here
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
6
Addiction Biology
51 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
8
Alcohol
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
9
Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
10
Neuropsychopharmacology
153 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
11
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.4%
12
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
13
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
14
Biological Psychiatry
137 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
15
Psychopharmacology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
16
Molecular Psychiatry
282 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
17
British Journal of Pharmacology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
18
Frontiers in Psychiatry
87 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
19
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
Clinical Trials
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
21
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%
22
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
International Journal of Drug Policy
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
24
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
25
Frontiers in Pharmacology
111 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
26
Nature Mental Health
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
27
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
28
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%