Back

Gene genealogies in haploid populations evolving according to sweepstakes reproduction

Eldon, B.

2026-01-12 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.01.08.698389 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Recruitment dynamics, or the distribution of the number of offspring among individuals, is fundamental to ecology and evolution. We take sweepstakes reproduction to mean a skewed (heavy right-tailed) offspring number distribution without natural selection being involved. Sweepstakes may be generated by chance matching of reproduction with favorable environmental conditions. Gene genealogies generated by sweepstakes reproduction are in the domain of attraction of multiple-merger coalescents where a random number of lineages merges at such times. We consider population genetic models of sweepstakes reproduction for haploid panmictic populations of both constant (N), and varying population size, and evolving in a random environment. We construct our models so that we can recover the observed number of new mutations in a given sample without requiring strong assumptions regarding the population size or the mutation rate. Our main results are (i) continuous-time coalescents that are either the Kingman coalescent or specific families of Beta- or Poisson-Dirichlet coalescents; when combining the results the parameter of the Beta-coalescent ranges from 0 to 2, and the Beta-coalescents may be incomplete due to an upper bound on the number of potential offspring an arbitrary individual may produce; (ii) in large populations we measure time in units proportional to either N/log N or N generations; (iii) incorporating fluctuations in population size leads to time-changed multiple-merger coalescents where the time-change does not depend on ; (iv) using simulations we show that in some cases approximations of functionals of a given coalescent do not match the ones of the ancestral process in the domain of attraction of the given coalescent; (v) approximations of functionals obtained by conditioning on the population ancestry (the ancestral relations of all gene copies at all times) are broadly similar (for the models considered here) to the approximations obtained without conditioning on the population ancestry.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Theoretical Population Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.1%
2
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
19.1%
3
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
7.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
5
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.4%
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 16%
4.4%
7
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.7%
8
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
9
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
10
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.9%
11
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
12
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
13
Journal of Mathematical Biology
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
14
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.2%
15
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.2%
16
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
17
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.0%
18
Systematic Biology
121 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
19
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.8%
21
Virus Evolution
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
23
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.5%
24
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%