Back

Performance of a Supervised Nurse-led Outpatient Clinic for Difficult-to-manage Gout Patients at a Tertiary Center

Maurer, P.; Herren, R.; Manigold, T.

2026-01-11 rheumatology
10.64898/2026.01.08.26343694 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundGout is the among the most prevalent arthritides worldwide and is associated with high morbidity, cardiovascular risk, and substantial healthcare burden. Despite effective urate-lowering therapies (ULT), many patients remain undertreated, particularly those with severe or complex disease. Nurse-led gout management has improved outcomes in primary care, but data in multimorbid tertiary center populations are lacking. ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of a supervised nurse-led gout clinic in achieving and maintaining serum urate (UA) targets in a tertiary hospital cohort. MethodsIn this observational study at University Hospital Bern (May 2023-Jan 2026), 69 patients with confirmed gout were enrolled. Patients were assigned to UA targets of <300 {micro}mol/L (Group 1: severe gout) or <360 {micro}mol/L (Group 2: non-severe gout). An advanced Practice Nurse (APN) provided education, a rheumatologist provided pharmacological management per 2020 ACR guidelines. UA levels, flare frequency, prophylaxis, and treatment adjustments were monitored, with follow-up at six and twelve months. ResultsGroup 1 required higher allopurinol doses than Group 2 (p<0.01). UA targets were achieved in 82% of Group 1 regimens and 68% of Group 2. Flare rates and prophylaxis use were comparable. At six and twelve months, 62-67% of Group 1 and 83-88% of Group 2 maintained UA targets. Failures were often due to external treatment modifications. No major ULT-related adverse events were observed. ConclusionSupervised nurse-led gout management effectively achieves UA targets in this "difficult-to-manage" cohort. Maintaining UA targets may benefit from shorter follow-up intervals and enhanced education for patients and healthcare providers.

Published in BMC Rheumatology · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.