Quantitative Deciphering of Mammalian Histamine Receptors through Mathematical Genomics
Hassan, S. S.; Nawn, D.; Goswami, P.; Mukherjee, N.; Sil, M.; Roy, S.; GOSWAMI, A.; Das, S.; Uversky, V. N.
Show abstract
Histamine receptors (HRH1-HRH4) are G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) that mediate essential physiological functions, including neurotransmission, gastric acid secretion, immune regulation, and presynaptic autoregulation. Despite their importance, systematic comparative analyses across mammalian histamine receptor sequences remain scarce. In this study, we performed a comprehensive evaluation of HRH1-HRH4 across multiple mammalian species, integrating sequence homology, invariant residue mapping, amino acid substitutions, compositional frequencies, Shannon entropy, polystring distributions, intrinsic disorder profiling, and phylogenetic clustering. HRH2 and HRH1 were highly conserved among primates, HRH3 showed strong cohesion within rodents, while HRH4 exhibited pronounced divergence consistent with immune-related specialization. Invariant residues localized to transmembrane helices and activation motifs (D107, W428/Y431, NPxxY), underscoring strict evolutionary constraints on ligand binding, receptor stability, and G-protein coupling. Substitutions were confined to non-essential lipid-facing and loop regions, predominantly conservative in nature, enabling diversification without disrupting the GPCR fold. Amino acid frequency and entropy analyses revealed hydrophobic dominance with subtype-specific enrichment of polar residues, while disorder profiling identified HRH1 as the most dynamic and HRH2 as the most structurally constrained. Polystring analysis highlighted conserved motifs (WWW, PP) alongside subtype- and species-specific repeats, reflecting evolutionary strategies balancing receptor stability with adaptive flexibility. Phylogenetic clustering confirmed subtype-specific cohesion, with HRH3 and HRH4 forming compact clades, HRH1 showing moderate dispersion, and HRH2 forming the most isolated cluster. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that mammalian histamine receptor evolution is governed by conserved biophysical cores and selective variability, offering insights into structural conservation, functional diversification, and translational relevance for drug design and model selection.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Prediction of Essential Binding Domains for the Endocannabinoid N-Arachidonoylethanolamine (AEA) in the Brain Cannabinoid CB1 receptor 92%
- Contribution of amino acids in the Active site of Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 to the catalytic action of the enzyme 92%
- SARS-CoV-2: Proof of recombination between strains and emergence of possibly more virulent ones 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Role of Dengue in SARS-CoV-2 Evolution in Dengue Endemic Regions 92%
- Computationally Grafting an IgE Epitope onto a Scaffold: Implications for a Pan Anti-Allergy Vaccine Design 92%
- Evolutionary progression of collective mutations in Omicron sub-lineages towards efficient RBD-hACE2: allosteric communications between and within viral and human proteins 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- In silico investigation of the new UK (B.1.1.7) and South African (501Y.V2) SARS-CoV-2 variants with a focus at the ACE2-Spike RBD interface 91%
- Modelling the effects of PPARβδ of innate inflammatory responses in lung tissues 91%
- Elucidation of Structural Mechanism of ATP Inhibition at the AAA1 Subunit of Cytoplasmic Dynein 1 Using a Chemical "Toolkit" 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Evolutionary History Of The Orexin/Allatotropin Gpcr Family: From Placozoa And Cnidaria To Vertebrata 93%
- Pan-cancer in silico analysis of somatic mutations in G-protein coupled receptors: The effect of evolutionary conservation and natural variance 92%
- Predicting human and viral protein variants affecting COVID-19 susceptibility and repurposing therapeutics 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.