Back

Exploring causal factors of coastal chlorophyll-a dynamics and their potential contributions to near future forecasting

Huang, S.; Ushio, M.

2026-01-08 ecology
10.64898/2026.01.07.698127 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Harmful algal blooms have been causing significant damage worldwide, and Hong Kong is no exception. To understand the drivers of algal bloom formation and forecast the dynamics of chlorophyll-a (Chl-a), a proxy for algal abundance, in Hong Kong waters, this study utilized nonlinear time series analysis, called empirical dynamic modeling (EDM), to investigate Chl-a dynamics using in situ measurements and remote sensing data. We first conducted causality tests of EDM to identify environmental factors influencing Chl-a at different sites. As for the in situ measurement data, salinity was the strongest causal factor among environmental factors. However, inputting the causal factors into the forecasting model did not greatly improve the forecasting performance for Chl-a, suggesting that factors not included in the current dataset, such as wind direction and current speed, may play a more critical role in Chl-a dynamics. As for the remote sensing data, sea surface temperature (SST) showed significant causal effect on Chl-a at most sites and the multivariate forecasting model including Chl-a and SST outperformed the univariate model at most sites. This study is the first to employ EDM to investigate Chl-a dynamics in Hong Kong waters, showcasing its potential to identify causal factors and improve forecasting accuracy. The findings provide scientific insights into Chl-a dynamics and water quality monitoring and modeling in a coastal region.

Published in Marine Pollution Bulletin · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.