Back

Transfer Learning for Medical Imaging: An Empirical Evaluation of CNN Architectures on Chest Radiographs

Salve, H. S.

2026-01-08 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.01.07.26343591 medRxiv
Show abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive comparative study of five state-of-the-art CNN architectures, VGG19, ResNet50, InceptionV3, DenseNet121, and EfficientNetB0 for multi-class classification of Chest X-ray images (CXR) into four categories: Edema, Normal, Pneumonia, and Tuberculosis (TB). The models were trained, validated, and tested on a dataset comprising 6,092 training and 325 testing images across four distinct classes. Each architecture was initialized with ImageNet weights, augmented with a custom classifier, and fine-tuned under identical conditions to ensure a fair comparison. The models are evaluated on a comprehensive set of metrics, including accuracy, per-class recall, training time, and model complexity. Experimental results indicate that VGG19 achieved the highest classification accuracy of 98.15%, followed closely by ResNet50 at 97.54%. This study provides empirical evidence to guide the selection of appropriate deep learning models for chest X-ray diagnosis, balancing performance with operational constraints

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.