Back

Delta PSA: A New Metric for Conformational Dynamics Underlying Macrocyclic Peptide Permeability

Yu, Y.; Wu, Q.; Chem, J.; She, Y.; Zhu, L.; Guo, Z.

2026-01-06 biochemistry
10.64898/2026.01.06.697862 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Development of oral cyclic drugs often suffers from low oral bioavailability resulting from limited passive permeability making accurate prediction a central challenge in drug development. Existing approaches generally fall into two categories: deep learning-based models and accelerated molecular dynamics (aMD) simulations. While deep learning models enable rapid, high-throughput predictions, they often suffer from dependence on training data, and sensitivity to dataset biases. On the other hand, aMD provide mechanistic interpretability by explicitly modeling peptide translocation across lipid bilayers, however, suffer from huge computational cost. Here, we present a conventional MD-based framework for predicting macrocyclic peptide permeability, designed to facilitate interpretation. Importantly, we show that Delta PSA ({Delta}PSA) directly quantifies a peptides chameleon propensity, providing a mechanistically meaningful measure. Furthermore, we identify two key structural indicators--the sidechain PSA ratio and the radius of gyration--as refined metrics for assessing conformational behavior. When applied to a benchmark dataset of macrocyclic peptides, our framework achieves an MSE of 0.22, surpassing the 0.25 reported for Multi_CycGT and demonstrating its superior performance. Our work also provides a large dataset of MD trajectories for macrocyclic peptides in both polar and nonpolar environments. This dataset offers access to a broader conformational space for cyclic peptide studies. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=97 SRC="FIGDIR/small/697862v2_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (35K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@18fc9e4org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@10fbc70org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1c763aorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@95d9e4_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.