Translational Study of using FOCM/TS Metabolites for Supporting Autism Spectrum Disorder Diagnosis
Arici, H.; Causey, M.; Patra, S.; Kruger, U.; Villegas Uribe, C. A.; Melmed, R.; Ciuk, C.; Crisler, S.; Marler, S.; Witters-Cundiff, A.; Bhadressa, S.; Slattery, J.; Hahn, J.
Show abstract
PurposeSeveral clinical studies have shown correlations between certain physiological measurements and an autism spectrum disorder (ASD) diagnosis. Such findings, however, have generally not resulted in tangible progress towards practical translation. In fact, most studies have been retrospective in nature and compare biomarker profiles in children with an ASD diagnosis to those who are typically developing. A clinically meaningful test, however, requires an ASD diagnostic center to distinguish children from those with a developmental disorder pre-diagnosis. MethodsThis paper presents, for the first time, a double-blind case/control trial design in which metabolic profiles, collected at two developmental pediatric clinics, were collected from children on a diagnostic waitlist for the purpose of developing a blood-based test for ASD. Besides obtaining blood samples, the children underwent gold-standard clinical evaluations, including the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS), Mullens Scale of Early Learning (MSEL), and Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale (VABS). The analysis, together with a complete medical history and physical exam, allowed to confirm or rule-out suspected ASD using DSM-V criteria. The study was based on a cohort of 140 children between the ages 18-60 months, that were referred to a developmental pediatrician because of concerns in their development. Results114 of these children received an ASD diagnosis, while 26 were diagnosed with non-ASD related developmental delays. Based on the measured metabolites, artificial intelligence-based classification algorithms allowed for an over 80% accuracy in predicting whether a sample came from a child diagnosed with ASD or not. ConclusionWhile these results need to be replicated in a larger study, especially involving more children with non-ASD related developmental delays, this is the first work using physiological measurements, coupled with AI, to support ASD diagnoses in a clinically relevant setting.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Multiclass Classification of Autism Spectrum Disorder, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, and Typically Developed Individuals Using fMRI Functional Connectivity Analysis 95%
- Identifying Neuroanatomical and Behavioral Features for Autism Spectrum Disorder Diagnosis in Children using Machine Learning 94%
- Characteristics of University Students Supported by Counseling Services: Analysis of psychological tests and pulse rate variability 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A method for measuring mitochondrial DNA copy number in pediatric populations 89%
- Alterations in excitatory and inhibitory synaptic development within the mesolimbic dopamine pathway in a mouse model of prenatal drug exposure 89%
- Noninvasive optical monitoring of cerebral hemodynamics in a preclinical model of neonatal intraventricular hemorrhage 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hyperactivity is linked to elevated cortisol levels: comprehensive behavioral analysis in the prenatal valproic acid-induced marmoset model of autism 93%
- Affinity Scores: An Individual-centric Fingerprinting Framework for Neuropsychiatric Disorders 91%
- mtDNA copy number, mtDNA total somatic deletions, Complex I activity, synapse number and synaptic mitochondria number are altered in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of predictive patient characteristics for assessing the probability of COVID-19 in-hospital mortality 91%
- HaptiKart: An engaging videogame reveals elevated proprioceptive vs. visual bias in individuals with autism spectrum disorder 90%
- Evaluating and mitigating unfairness in multimodal remote mental health assessments 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.